Skip to content

Clareon CNWET3 (UDI 00380652466493)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652466493), received between Jan 9, 2024 and Jan 30, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Break2
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn2
  • Defective Device1
  • Failure to Deliver1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Blurred Vision2
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, PATIENT WAS DISSATISFIED WITH DISTANCE VISION, DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY THROWING PATIENT OFF. PATIENT LIKES NEAR AND INTERMEDIATE VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENS (ATIOL) AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS PATIENT AIMED FOR -100 BUT STILL DISSATISFIED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 24222743 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 17, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, LENS HAD A FAILURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED THAT, THE LENS WAS CHIPPED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23829483 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2025Break; Failure to Deliver; Break; Failure to Deliver

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE LENS STUCK IN LOADER AND HAPTIC BROKE. THE LENS WAS NOT USED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATING THAT LENS GOT STUCK IN COMPANY CARTRIDGE ON ADVANCEMENT AND THE HAPTIC BROKE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH BACK UP LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT AND NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23461733 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 23, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, CRACKED LENS DURING LOADING. THERE WAS A PATIENT CONTACT AND NO PATIENT HARM. LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN INITIAL PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22305610 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 6, 2025Break; Break

    A NURSE REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) HAPTIC BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, RECEIVED AND STATED THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING THE PROCEDURE AND THERE WAS PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22157517 ↗
  • InjuryJan 10, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, LENS WAS EXPLANTED IN SECONDARY PROCEDURE DUE TO PATIENT EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY READING TV CAPTIONS 6 FT, TROUBLE READING ROAD SIGNS, CANNOT DRIVE AT NIGHT. VISUAL ACUITY WAS NOT SHARP. THE CLINICAL REASON WAS REPORTED TO BE GENERAL DYSPHOTOPSIA. THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH OTHER COMPANY LENS APPROXIMATELY THREE MONTHS AFTER INITIAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NOT PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 21125155 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2024Scratched Material; Scratched Material

    HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE INTRAOCULAR LENS SHOWS A SMALL MARK, WHICH WAS NOT CAUSED BY THE INJECTOR FOR ITS IMPLANTATION. NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE PATIENT, AND THE CATARACT REMOVAL AND LENS PLACEMENT WERE COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19466614 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON NOTICED THE MARKINGS WERE NOT IN THEIR USUAL PLACE ON THE IOL HAPTIC AND OPTIC JUNCTION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19133103 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED RESIDUAL ASTIGMATISM/MYOPIA AND CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT BEING REFRACTIVE ERROR NOT TOLERATED. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN ATIOL FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 18473948 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page