Skip to content

Clareon CNWET4 (UDI 00380652466783)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652466783), received between Oct 18, 2023 and Aug 12, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50222434 ↗
  • InjuryMay 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD VERY POOR NEAR AND INTERMEDIATE VISION. HER VISUAL ACUITY (VA) FOR NEAR VISION WAS 20/100, INTERMEDIATE VISION WAS 20/30 AND DISTANCE VISION WAS 20/25. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, YET NO NEW INFORMATION RECEIVED. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS. THIS FILE IS 2 OF 2.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 25080370 ↗
  • InjuryMay 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT BEGAN EXPERIENCED HAZY VISION IN LEFT EYE (OS) WAS GREATER THAN OD (RIGHT EYE) SO, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT POST PRK (PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY). ADDITIONALLY, THE PATIENT ALSO EXPERIENCING BLURRY VISION AT DISTANCE AND NEAR, HAZY VISION, RESIDUAL ASTIGMATISM, HALOS AND GLARE RESULTING IN AN INABILITY TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. THE PATIENT WAS ADVISED TO CONTINUE USING PRESERVATIVE-FREE ARTIFICIAL TEARS (LUBRICATING EYE DROPS) 3 TO 4 TIMES DAILY. ADDITIONALLY, A TAPERING REGIMEN OF A CORTICOSTEROID WAS INITIATED, WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO INSTILL ONE DROP IN THE LEFT EYE (OS) THREE TIMES A DAY FOR 2 WEEKS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO RELATED REPORTS FOR THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT ADDRESSES THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURER REPORT WILL BE FILED FOR THE FELLOW EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 22095786 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS VERY HAPPY WITH THE VISION OF LENS. THE SURGEON USED BLUE-BLOCKING LENSES WHICH THE PATIENT WAS INTOLERANT. REPORTED THAT THE DAY THE SECOND LENS WAS IMPLANTED FELT VERY SLEEPY ALL THE TIME WHICH CAUSED SLEEP CYCLE ISSUES DUE TO MELATONIN OVERLOAD. THE PATIENT DISCUSSED WITH THE SURGEON BUT COULDN'T FIND THE ANSWER. THE PATIENT DID A LOT OF RESEARCH AND FOUND A SURGEON WHO RECOMMENDED TO EXPLANT THE RIGHT LENS AND EXCHANGE IT FOR A CLEAR LENS. THE SURGEON FEELS IT WILL RESOLVE THE SLEEP CYCLE ISSUE. THE SURGEON HAD ALSO INFORMED THAT HE WILL NOT USE THE BLUE BLOCK LENSES IN THE PATIENT'S EYE BECAUSE OF SCENARIO. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17955112 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page