Skip to content

Clareon CNWET4 (UDI 00380652466851)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652466851), received between Jul 20, 2024 and Jun 22, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Halo1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 22, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY WHILE OPENING THE BLISTER IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE LENS WAS BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY BY USING ANOTHER LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT WITH THE SUSPECTED DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25588690 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 18, 2026Material Twisted/Bent

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT THE LENS WAS NOT IMPLANTED, HAPTIC ON TOP OF THE PART. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24377447 ↗
  • InjuryJul 21, 2025No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT AND CLINICAL REASON AS MECHANICAL COMPLICATION OF LENS. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED FOR AN UNKNOWN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22555701 ↗
  • InjuryJul 20, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARE AND HALOS. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH MONOFOCAL LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS POSITIVE DYSPHOTOPSIA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 19786902 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page