Clareon™ CNWTT5 (UDI 00380652469548)Recalls & reported problems
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · STERILE UV and Blue Light Filtering Hydrophobic Acrylic Foldable Diffractive Aspheric Toric Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652469548), received between May 23, 2024 and Aug 7, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Scratched Material” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Scratched Material1
Patient problems
- Blurred Vision1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 7, 2025Scratched Material; Scratched Material
A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, SCRATCH ON THE LENS WAS NOTICED, WITH NO PATIENT CONTACT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY WITH ANOTHER UNSPECIFIED LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22737741 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A NURSE REPORTED THAT AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT WAS FRUSTRATED WITH NEAR AND DISTANT VISION AND WAS UNHAPPY OVERALL. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-COMPANY LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS "NO IMPROVEMENT IN NEAR VISION".
Patient problems: Blurred Vision
MAUDE report 19380886 ↗
Other LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS devices
- TECNIS IOL ZCT150Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS1 recall7 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS43 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS36 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS32 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS30 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS29 reports
- Clareon CNWTT0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS21 reports
- TECNIS IOL DIU150Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS19 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page