Skip to content

Clareon CNWET3 (UDI 00380652485524)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00380652485524), received between Jan 1, 2024 and Jan 1, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Diplopia/Double Vision1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 1, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT CAN READ NORMAL SIZE FONTS ON PHONE AT A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 19-20 - NOT THE BEST. THE PATIENT GOOD WITH MEDIUM DISTANCES LIKE A TV; HOWEVER, WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT, PATIENT HAD CHALLENGES. AT NIGHT, STOP LIGHTS DO NOT HAVE HALOS, BUT SEEING SORT OF A DUPLICATE IMAGE OFFSET BY 45 DEGREES OF SO, AS GETS CLOSER TO 120 FEET THE TRAFFIC LIGHT PERFECTLY CLEAR. CAR BREAK LIGHTS IN THE DISTANCE LOOK LIKE PERFECT RED DOTS WITH NO HALO OR ANY OTHER PROBLEM AT ALL. DURING THE DAYTIME NO PROBLEM WITH ANYTHING, EXCEPT FOR READING MY MOBILE DEVICE IS FURTHER THAT PATIENT EXPECTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND STATED THAT, PATIENT SAW AN OPTOMETRIST WHO DETERMINE THAT HAD EXCELLENT VISION BUT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE AN OPINION ON WHY PATIENT SEE DUPLICATE OBJECTS AT NIGHT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A YAG PROCEDURE ON THE LEFT EYE, THE OPHTHALMOLOGIST SAID THE RIGHT LENSES WAS CLEAR. AFTERWARDS, PATIENT CAN SEE A SLIGHT VISION IMPROVEMENT BUT STILL SEE A TWO IMAGES SLIGHTLY OFFSET TO EACH OTHER AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE . SAME FOR STOP LIGHT OR ANY BRIGHT LIGHT AT NIGHT. YET, ALL FREEWAYS SIGNS READ PE

    Patient problems: Diplopia/Double Vision

    MAUDE report 18423096 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page