Skip to content

Clareon CCWET4 (UDI 00380652486101)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Clareon Vivity Toric UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon (1142)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00380652486101), received between Jun 13, 2025 and Jun 13, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 13, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT, AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE PATIENT'S POST OPERATIVE VISION WAS 20/60 AND THE LENS HAD ROTATED TO 27 DEGREE AXIS WITH REFRACTION -1.76 +3.00 X95. THE SURGEON HAD USED 10 DIOPTER LENS AT 90 DEGREES INITIALLY. SO, THE DOCTOR RAN ASTIGMATISM FIX AND IT SAID TO ROTATE THE LENS BACK TO 80 DEGREES SO THE PATIENT WOULD END UP ABOUT -0.50 +0.50 X80. THE PATIENT HAD AN APPOINTMENT FOR HIS SECOND EYE ON (B)(6) AND THE DOCTOR WAS THINKING TO ROTATE THE LENS ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT, THE LENS GOT ROTATED AFTER SURGERY WHICH WAS LARGER THAN NORMAL AL. THE DOCTOR THEN RE-ROTATED THE LENS AND THE PATIENT WAS DOING BETTER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT, THE DIAGNOSIS OF THE HARM WAS BLURRY UNCORRECTED VISION WITH MORE ASTIGMATISM, THE PATIENT'S ISSUE WAS NOT RESOLVED, THE LENS WAS ROTATED TO THE CORRECT AXIS BUT THEN IT RE ROTATED OUT OF THE POSITION AGAIN BY 1 WEEK AFTER THE SURGERY. THE LENS WHICH ROTATED OUT OF THE POSITION FOR THE SECOND TIME WAS NOT FIXED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 22204465 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page