Skip to content

ACRYSOF® Monoflex® MA60AC (REF MA60AC.130)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) SOFT ACRYLIC MULTIPIECE STERILEPCL(IOL/PC), 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, Monoflex(TM*)10-DEGREE HAPTICS. *REG. U.S. PAT. & TM OFF. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF Monoflex (94)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652552387), received between Nov 3, 2021 and Feb 6, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Eye Injury1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Vitreous Floaters1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2026Material Twisted/Bent

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL WITH DESCRIPTION OF HAPTIC WAS KINKED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24276146 ↗
  • InjuryDec 23, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED MULTIPLE VISUAL DISTURBANCES FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF THE SECONDARY IOL ON (B)(6) 2023, INCLUDING CLOUDY VISION, FLUCTUATING NEAR VISION, FLOATERS, AND PROGRESSIVE BLURRY VISION WITH DECREASED OS VISION DESPITE PRK ENHANCEMENT. PERSISTENT DISSATISFACTION AND LACK OF IMPROVEMENT LED TO THE DECISION TO EXPLANT THE COMPANY LENS AND REPLACE IT WITH ANOTHER BRAND ON (B)(6) 2025. NO ADDITIONAL COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED DURING THE EXCHANGE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Vitreous Floaters

    MAUDE report 23876316 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 25, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED AND WAS NOT USED. THERE WAS NO CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22329283 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 30, 2023Break; Break

    A PHARMACY ASSISTANT REPORTED DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION THE IMPLANT WAS BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17235985 ↗
  • InjuryNov 3, 2021Break; Break

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE HAPTIC WAS BROKE WITH NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING HAPTIC WAS BROKE WITH PATIENT CONTACT. THE LENS WAS REMOVED BY WOUND ENLARGEMENT. THE WOUND WAS CLOSED WITH SUTURES. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED FOR THE EVENT AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. IN SURGEONS OPINION THE EVENT WAS CAUSED DUE TO TRACTION/TENSION OF PULLING ON THE TWO HAPTICS WHICH WAS DUE TO TYPE OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 12743506 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page