Skip to content

ACRYSOF® Monoflex® MA60AC (REF MA60AC.255)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) SOFT ACRYLIC MULTIPIECE STERILEPCL(IOL/PC), 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, Monoflex(TM*)10-DEGREE HAPTICS. *REG. U.S. PAT. & TM OFF. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF Monoflex (94)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652552639), received between Aug 23, 2024 and Mar 31, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Material Twisted/Bent3
  • Defective Device1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 31, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE LENS OPTIC WAS BROKEN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED USING THE BACK UP LENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24744205 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2026Break

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT BEFORE AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24247660 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 13, 2026Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, HAPTIC DEFORMED/ASYMMETRIC, WHEN THE IOL WAS BEING LOADED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24053242 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2025Break; Break

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT BEFORE SURGERY THE HAPTIC BROKEN WHEN PREPARING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER LENS. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONTACT AND NO PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23389774 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 11, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE HAPTIC WAS MISPLACED WHILE THE LENS WAS BEING LOADED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22771570 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING CATARACT SURGERY WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE LEADING HAPTIC OF THE LENS WAS ANGLED UPWARDS. DOCTOR TRIED TO STRAIGHTEN IT IN ANTERIOR CHAMBER BUT HAD TO EXPLANT THE LENS AS IT WAS TOUCHING THE ENDOTHELIUM. THERE WAS POSSIBLE ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS. THE LENS WAS REMOVED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE AND COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss

    MAUDE report 20236920 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2024Break; Break

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE BROKEN HAPTIC NOTED WITH INJECTION OF IOL INTO THE CAPSULAR BAG. IT HAD TO CUT AND EXPLANT THE IOL AND INSERT A NEW IOL. DURING EXPLANTATION, THE OTHER HAPTIC ALSO BROKE OF WHEN IT WAS PULLED TOWARDS THE CORNEAL INCISION. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR UNSPECIFIED LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REPORTED AS LEADING HAPTIC BROKEN WAS NOTED DURING IMPLANTED BUT IT WAS EXPLANTED AFTER 14 DAYS FROM INITIAL PROCEDURE AND IMPLANT A NEW LENS WITH NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20139021 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 23, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT AT THE TIME OF IMPLANTATION OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) BY THE DOCTOR, IT TURNED OUT NOT TO BE IMPLANTABLE BECAUSE IT WAS DEFECTIVE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20046734 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page