Skip to content

ACRYSOF® Monoflex® MA60AC (REF MA60AC.300)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) SOFT ACRYLIC MULTIPIECE STERILEPCL(IOL/PC), 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, Monoflex(TM*)10-DEGREE HAPTICS. *REG. U.S. PAT. & TM OFF. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF Monoflex (94)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380652552721), received between Oct 5, 2023 and Jul 9, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Defective Component2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Eye Pain1
  • Headache1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2026Material Twisted/Bent

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT BEFORE SURGERY, WHILE LOADING FOR AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE HAPTIC WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25769247 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 26, 2026Break

    THE NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR IMPLANTATION SURGERY WHILE IMPLANTING THE LENS IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE HAPTIC WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25281049 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Break; Break

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE TRAILING HAPTIC BROKE WHILE LOADING INTO CARTRIDGE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23816453 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 15, 2024Break; Break

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, THEY NOTICED THAT WHILE PLACING THE LENS OPTICS BREAK, SO IT MUST BE CHANGED WITH ANOTHER LENS. SINCE THE OPTICS NECESSARY TO FIX THE LENS IN THE SCLERA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAVE RECEIVED IT STATES THAT THE LENS WAS REMOVED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE AND COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER LENS AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19990456 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2023Defective Component; Malposition of Device; Defective Component; Malposition of Device

    A NURSE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE THE IT WAS FOUND THAT THE LENS IS DECENTRALIZED DOWN AND THE HAPTIC HAS FALLEN OUT FROM THE OPTICS HOLE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18267092 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 5, 2023Defective Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Defective Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, FINDINGS ON BOTH FOLLOW UP VISITS SHOWED WELL CENTERED IOL, CLEAR CORNEA & CORNEAL SUTURE IN PLACE ON OPERATED EYE. THE PATIENT CAME WITH COMPLAIN OF HEAD ACHE AND PAIN ON THE OPERATED EYE. AFTER THE EXAMINATION, THE SURGEON FOUND OUT THAT THE HAPTIC SLIPPED FROM THE JUNCTION ON OPTIC. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, RECEIVED AND STATED EXPLANT WAS PLANNED.

    Patient problems: Eye Pain; Headache

    MAUDE report 17874832 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page