Skip to content

ACRYSOF® Monoflex® MN60AC (REF MN60AC.180)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) Natural ACRYLIC FOLDABLE IOL W/BLUELIGHT FILTER, PCL(IOL/PC), 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mmANTERIOR ASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, 10-DEGREEMonoflex(TM*) HAPTICS. *REG. US PAT & TM OFF. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF Monoflex (94)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380655095072), received between Jul 9, 2021 and Sep 8, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Defective Device1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 8, 2021Defective Device; Defective Device

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED VIA IOL REPLY CARD THAT THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS DEFECTIVE/WASTED. ATTEMPTS TO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12437669 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2021Malposition of Device; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Malposition of Device; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT POST IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED TERRIBLE GLISTENING ALL OVER IT. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE DUE TO LENS DISLOCATION AND GLISTENINGS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12141146 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page