Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN60WF (REF SN60WF.125)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ ASPHERIC Natural IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE PCL, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, PLANAR HAPTICS. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380655095669), received between May 3, 2022 and Jul 25, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1
  • Defective Device1
  • Material Opacification1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • Visual Impairment2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Ptosis1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Vitreous Floaters1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 25, 2025Break; Break

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN VITRECTOMY PROCEDURE, LENS HAPTIC WAS BROKEN DURING DELIVERY OF IOL. LENS WAS EXPLANTED DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. PROCEDURE COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22621048 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18463660 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Material Opacification; Material Opacification

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT AFTER AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, NOTICED IOL¿S APPEAR ON THE SLIT LAMP TO BE OPACIFYING CAUSING VISUAL ACUITY LOSS. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEFT EYE.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 18463561 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE DISTANCE VISION BECAME LESS CLEAR SO MUCH SO THAT THE PRESCRIPTION NEEDED TO BE CHANGED WHICH NOTICEABLY CLEAR FOR DISTANCE IN THE BEGINNING. THE CONSUMER MENTIONED THAT SHE USED TO HAVE ONLY LITTLE BLACK LINES FOR FLOATERS, SINCE SURGERY IMMEDIATELY SHE WAS SEEING ¿GRAY CLOUDS¿ FLOATING BACK AND FORTH WITH MORE FREQUENCY, ALONG WITH THE ORIGINAL FLOATERS. THE FLOATERS SOMETIMES AFFECTED VISION WHILE DRIVING AND NIGHT DRIVING WAS STILL AN ISSUE AS THE GLARE FROM HEADLIGHTS WAS NO BETTER THAN IT WAS BEFORE WITH OR WITHOUT GLASSES. CONSUMER STATED THAT SHE HAD DROOPING OF THE RIGHT EYE AND IT HAS NOT GONE AWAY, VERY NOTICEABLE TO HER. RECENTLY SHE HAD RED AT THE BOTTOM LID OF RIGHT EYE, DOCTOR PRESCRIBED A DROP BUT SHE DID NOT USE AS SHE WAS AFRAID TO. CONSUMER ADDITIONALLY MENTIONED THAT RECENTLY GOT PRESCRIPTION SUNGLASSES FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SEEM TO BE WEARING THEM EVEN WHEN THE SUN WAS NOT SHINING AND WHEN DRIVING. NEVER HAD AN ISSUE WITH THIS BEFORE ALMOST LIKE SHE WAS SENSITIVE TO LIGHT, HER DISTANCE VISION WAS WORSE WHEN GLASSES WERE OFF AS SHE WAS ABLE TO WATCH TV IN BED AND READ THE GUIDE BU

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Ptosis; Visual Disturbances; Vitreous Floaters

    MAUDE report 16672112 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 23, 2022Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS CRINKLED AFTER INSERTION AND TAKEN OUT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14468794 ↗
  • InjuryMay 3, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD REFRACTIVE ERROR. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER LENS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 14264745 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page