Skip to content

ACRYSOF® SN60WF (REF SN60WF.265)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · AcrySof(R) IQ ASPHERIC Natural IOL, SINGLE-PIECE ACRYLIC FOLDABLE PCL, UV WITH BLUE LIGHTFILTER, 13.0mm LENGTH, 6.0mm ANTERIORASYMMETRIC BICONVEX OPTIC, PLANAR HAPTICS. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ACRYSOF (353)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380655095737), received between Jul 5, 2022 and Mar 12, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Scratched Material2
  • Defective Device1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Failure to Unfold or Unwrap1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2026Failure to Unfold or Unwrap

    A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, AFTER IMPLANTATION OF LENS IT WAS NOTED THAT BOTH THE LENS HAPTICS WERE TIGHTLY ADHERED TO THE OPTIC AND COULD ONLY BE SEPARATED WITH DIFFICULT MANUAL MANIPULATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, RECEIVED AND STATED PATIENT CURRENT CONDITION WAS GOOD. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS. THIS FILE IS 5 OF 5.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24579463 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 19, 2025Break; Scratched Material; Break; Scratched Material

    A PHARMACIST REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVED LENS BACK WITH A SCRATCH AND A BROKEN LEG. ANOTHER LENS WAS THEN PLACED AT THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21409346 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2025Break; Scratched Material; Break; Scratched Material

    A PHARMACIST REPORTED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVED LENS BACK WITH A SCRATCH AND A BROKEN LEG. ANOTHER LENS WAS THEN PLACED AT THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21065424 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2022Defective Device; Defective Device

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) THE THERE WAS PROBLEM WITH INSERTION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND RECEIVED LENS WAS INJECTED BUT THE INJECTOR PLUNGER SLID OVER THE TOP OF THE LENS WHILE IN THE CARTRIDGE. IT WAS HALF WAY INSERTED WHEN IT WAS REMOVED DUE TO CONCERN THAT THE PLUNGER SCRATCHED THE LENS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14916788 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2022Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS INJECTED BUT THE INJECTOR PLUNGER SLID OVER THE TOP OF THE LENS WHILE IN THE CARTRIDGE. IT WAS HALF WAY INSERTED WHEN IT WAS REMOVED DUE TO CONCERN THAT THE PLUNGER SCRATCHED THE LENS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14916072 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page