Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXCAT3 (REF PXCAT3.175)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658491277), received between Dec 3, 2025 and Apr 9, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision3
  • Visual Disturbances3
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2026Break

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE DURING THE INTRAOCULAR (IOL) LENS IMPLANT PROCEDURE HAPTIC WAS SHEARED OFF AND DID NOT COME OUT OF THE CARTRIDGE CORRECTLY. THERE WAS A PATIENT CONTACT WITH THE DEVICE AND PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THE TIP OF THE PRE-LOADED DEVICE WAS IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24834577 ↗
  • InjuryMar 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THAT PATIENT STILL NOT SEEING WELL, ESPECIALLY UP CLOSE. IN THE SURGEON¿S OPINION, THE PRODUCT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT. PATIENT WAS STILL UNSATISFIED WITH CLARITY OF VISION POST IOL EXCHANGE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 24590693 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD GHOSTING, HALOS AND BLURRY VISION. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR UNSPECIFIED LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, RECEIVED AND STATED THE PATIENT HAD NEAR AND INTERMEDIATE BLURRY VISION. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER COMPANY LENS. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RIGHT EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 24303990 ↗
  • InjuryDec 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A CONSUMER REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD LARGE HALOS AROUND HEADLIGHTS, BOTH NIGHT AND DAY, INTERFERING WITH SAFE DRIVING IMMEDIATELY AFTER CATARACT SURGERY. SURGEON SUGGESTED THAT AFTER SIX MONTHS, THE EFFECT MIGHT IMPROVE. THE DISTANCE VISION WAS NOT PERFECTLY CORRECTED, SO THE PATIENT SAW AN EYE CARE DOCTOR FOR A NEW PRESCRIPTION. THE NEW GLASSES RESULTED IN EXCELLENT DISTANCE VISION. HALOS ONLY SLIGHTLY CHANGED AND ARE STILL PROMINENT AROUND HEADLIGHTS AND OTHER LIGHTS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THERE ARE TWO MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEFT EYE.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 23705732 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page