Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXCAT3 (REF PXCAT3.190)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658491307), received between Aug 25, 2025 and Feb 27, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Visual Impairment2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED WITH NON COMPANY LENS IN THE SECONDARY IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT AND CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS WRONG POWER. THERE WAS NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 24470512 ↗
  • InjuryAug 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED POOR QUALITY OF VISION. THE IOL WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-COMPANY LENS 1 MONTH, 2 WEEKS, 4 DAYS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS POOR QUALITY OF VISION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THE PATIENT'S POST-OPERATIVE EXPERIENCE. AT ONE-WEEK POST-OP, THE UNCORRECTED NEAR VISUAL ACUITY (UCNVA) WAS REPORTED TO BE LESS THAN EXPECTED. BY THE SECOND WEEK, THE PATIENT NOTED EXPERIENCING HALOS AND CONTINUED TO HAVE LIMITED NEAR VISION. THE UNCORRECTED DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY (UCDVA) AND UCNVA REMAINED BELOW ANTICIPATED LEVELS. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT VISION IN THE LEFT EYE (OS) CONTINUED TO OUTPERFORM THE RIGHT EYE (OD). THE FOLLOWING DAY, (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED POOR QUALITY OF VISION AND WISHED TO PROCEED WITH LENS EXCHANGE IN RIGHT EYE. THERE WAS NO FURTHER HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 22885321 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page