Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXCAT3 (REF PXCAT3.205)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658491338), received between Dec 12, 2025 and Sep 24, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Dry Eye(s)1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2026Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    A facility representative reported during intraocular lens (IOL) implant procedure, leading haptic was sticking out. There was no patient contact and there was no patient harm.Additional information has been requested but is not available at the time of this report.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50882138 ↗
  • InjuryJul 15, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, FOLLOWING INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PRESBYOPIA. HENCE THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER ATIOL (ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRA OCULAR LENS) IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 25828207 ↗
  • InjuryApr 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRY VISION, DRY EYE. HENCE THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER (NON-COMPANY) LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT WAS MENTIONED AS COULD NOT NEUROADAPTIVE THE LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, YET NO NEW INFORMATION RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Dry Eye(s)

    MAUDE report 24999686 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 22, 2026Scratched Material

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON NOTICED SCRATCH OR MARK ON THE OPTIC. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED AND RECEIVED STATING THAT THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. THIS REPORT IS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS. THIS FILE IS 1 OF 2.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24148212 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SEVERE DYSPHOTOPSIAS AND STARBURSTS AND DID NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING AT NIGHT. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A OTHER COMPANY MONOFOCAL LENS IN A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. THE CLINICAL REASON FOR THE EXPLANT WAS DYSPHOTOPSIAS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AS THERE WAS NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 23787236 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page