Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXCAT3 (REF PXCAT3.225)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658491376), received between Nov 28, 2025 and Mar 9, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Activation Problem1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • Visual Disturbances2
  • Visual Impairment2
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Diplopia/Double Vision1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 9, 2026Material Deformation

    A NURSE REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS DAMAGED ONCE INSERTED . THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED DURING INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON SAME DAY USING BACK IOL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24546767 ↗
  • InjuryJan 7, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED GLARE AND CHANGES IN COLOR PERCEPTION. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A TORIC LENS DURING A SECONDARY PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 23988969 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 26, 2025Activation Problem; Activation Problem

    A NON-HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, LENS ADVANCED TOO SOON. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATED, THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY USING A REPLACEMENT LENS OF SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23895799 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO TOLERATE GLARE AND HALOS. THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR UNSPECIFIED ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INTRAOCULAR LENS. CLINICAL REASON FOR EXPLANT MENTIONED AS CONTINUED DIFFICULTY WITH VISION, SEEING MULTIPLE IMAGES, AND SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY TO LIGHT WITH SEVERE SUBJECTIVE HALO. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Diplopia/Double Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 23727984 ↗
  • InjuryNov 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED POOR VISION. CLINICAL REASON BEING MENTIONED AS BCVA 20/30 -2. THE IOL WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED WITH NON COMPANY LENS IN THE SECONDARY IMPLANT PROCEDURE. IN THE SURGEON¿S OPINION, THE PRODUCT CONTRIBUTED TO OR CAUSE THE EVENT. IN THE SURGEON¿S PROGNOSIS, THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS GOOD AND ISSUES WAS RESOLVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 23671503 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page