Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXCAT4 (REF PXCAT4.260)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658491932), received between Nov 3, 2025 and Apr 15, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Deliver” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Failure to Deliver1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 15, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED HALOS AND LIGHT SENSITIVITY. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED AND EXCHANGED WITH MONOFOCAL LENS 3 MONTHS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 24885242 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2025Failure to Deliver; Failure to Deliver

    A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS STUCK IN THE CARTRIDGE AND WOULD NOT ADVANCE. FOLLOW-UP DETAILS CONFIRMED PATIENT CONTACT, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23451780 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page