Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXCAT6 (REF PXCAT6.225)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME UVA · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658492847), received between Sep 17, 2025 and Feb 27, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Inaccurate Delivery1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Inaccurate Delivery

    A NONHEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE LENS STARTED TO BE IN PLACE AND THEN EJECTS ITSELF AND DEEMED FAULTY. THE TECH STATED THAT, THE PROVIDER MAY BE STARTING TO DEPLOY THE LENS PRIOR TO BE FULLY INSERTED AND SO THE LENS STARTED TO BE IN PLACE AND THEN EJECTS ITSELF. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24469477 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, RECEIVED AND REPORTED THAT THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR THE SAME LENS MODEL BUT TWO DIOPTER MORE POWER INDICATING THE CORRECT LENS POWER WAS NOT IMPLANTED INITIALLY. THERE IS NO REPORTED DEFECT OR FAULT WITH THE IOL.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 24340728 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON NOTICED TROUBLE IN HAPTIC DURING LOADING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY WITH SAME MODEL AND DIOPTER COMPANY LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23072721 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page