Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXYAT0 (REF PXYAT0.110)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CL PANOPTIX PRO ATME BLF · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658493103), received between Nov 14, 2025 and Jul 28, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Product Quality Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 2 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • Blurred Vision3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 28, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A non-health care professional reported that following an intraocular lens (IOL) implantation procedure, the patient experienced glare/halos and can't drive at night or in rainy conditions. Additional information was received that carbachol (2.75%) and brimonidine tartrate (0.1%) in combination drops were prescribed as medication to help with glare and halos. The patient returned after a few days stating the drops might have been helping a little and was given the option of an IOL exchange vs continuing to give it more time to adapt. The patient wished to give it more time and scheduled her next appointment later.There are two Medical Device Reports associated with this patient. This report is associated with the right eye.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 50053648 ↗
  • InjuryJul 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT, AFTER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THERE WAS DISCOMFORT IN THE VISION, SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AFTER REPLACEMENT THE SYMPTOMS WAS RESOLVED AND THERE WAS NO PROBLEM.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision

    MAUDE report 25815769 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, PATIENT VISUAL OUTCOME WAS NOT GOOD. THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED 20 DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED WITH MONOFOCAL LENS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED THAT PATIENT ALSO EXPERIENCED BLURRED NEAR AND FAR VISION. PATIENT ISSUES WERE RESOLVED. THE PATIENT EXCHANGED WITH NON-COMPANY LENS MODEL.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 24307512 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 14, 2025Product Quality Problem; Product Quality Problem

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE LENS WAS IMPLANTED AND SUBSEQUENTLY EXPLANTED DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF AIR BUBBLES WITHIN THE ACRYLIC. THE SURGEON HAD TO CUT THE LENS AND REPLACED IT WITH ANOTHER UNSPECIFIED LENS. THE PROCEDURE WAS TRAUMATIC TO THE PATIENT'S EYE. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT ONE PIECE OF THE LENS CONTAINED THE BUBBLES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23555462 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page