Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXYAT3 (REF PXYAT3.165)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME BLF · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658494193), received between Mar 4, 2026 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Twisted/Bent” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Optical Decentration1
  • Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 9, 2026Optical Decentration

    A non-healthcare professional reported that following an intraocular lens (IOL) implant procedure, the patient was having poor near vision and double Vision, Clinical reason poor IOL implant, and IOL decentration. The IOL was exchanged for Unspecified Advanced Technology Intraocular Lens (ATIOL) 26 days following the initial implant procedure. Additional information has been requested but is not available at the time of this report.

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 50696613 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2026Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED AND REPORTED THAT THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR THE SAME LENS MODEL BUT HALF A DIOPTER MORE POWER INDICATING THE CORRECT LENS POWER WAS NOT IMPLANTED INITIALLY. THERE IS NO REPORTED DEFECT OR FAULT WITH THE IOL.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 24686045 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2026Material Twisted/Bent

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, FRONT HAPTIC CAME OUT STRAIGHT AND TWISTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED ON THE SAME DAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24511520 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page