Skip to content

Clareon PanOptix Pro PXYAT3 (REF PXYAT3.170)Recalls & reported problems

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · CLRN PO PRO TORIC ATME BLF · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Clareon PanOptix Pro (222)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380658494209), received between Dec 5, 2025 and Jun 10, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 10, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BLURRED VISION AT NEAR AND DISTANCE, HAD HALOES AND GLARE, AND THESE SYMPTOMS WERE VERY BOTHERSOME. THE PATIENT WAS NOT ABLE TO TOLERATE THE MONOFOCAL LENS. THE PATIENT WAS ON OCULAR SURFACE TREATMENT, BUT THERE WAS NO IMPROVEMENT IN THE SYMPTOMS. HENCE, SURGEON PLANNED FOR LENS EXCHANGE. THERE WERE TWO MEDICAL REPORTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAME EVENT. THIS FILE BELONGED TO THE RIGHT EYE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 25457255 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    A NON-HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED DURING INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANT PROCEDURE, WHEN INJECTING INTO THE EYE, THE TRAILING HAPTIC WAS WRAPPED AROUND THE PLUNGER. IT WAS IMPLANTED BUT STILL HAD WRAPPED TRAILING HAPTIC. LENS WAS PLACED WITHOUT ISSUE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23735885 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2025Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    A NONHEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING THE INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL)IMPLANTATION SURGERY, THE TRAILING HAPTIC WAS WRAPPED AROUND THE PLUNGER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23728583 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page