ABBOTT PRISM 6E50-68Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Laboratories · ABBOTT PRISM HTLV-I/HTLV-II Assay Kit
All models of ABBOTT PRISM (9)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380740063016), received between Nov 8, 2017 and Jan 6, 2022 — classified as 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “False Positive Result” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- False Positive Result10
- False Negative Result1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient8
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 6, 2022False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED (B)(6) PRISM HTLV-I/HTLV-II RESULTS ON MULTIPLE PATIENTS WHEN PERFORMING A VALIDATION STUDY ON THE ALINITY S ANALYZER. ALL OF THE (B)(6) PRISM SAMPLES TESTED NEGATIVE ON THE ALINITY S. WESTERN BLOT (WB) TESTING WAS (B)(6) FOR ALL BUT ONE SAMPLE, WHICH WAS INDETERMINATE (IND). RESULTS PROVIDED: (B)(6) RESULTS (B)(6). NO IMPACT TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13177770 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2021False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED FALSE REPEAT REACTIVE PRISM CHAGAS, PRISM HCV, AND PRISM HTLV RESULTS WERE GENERATED. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE SAMPLES WERE ARCHIVED THEN RUN ON THE ALINITY S FOR VALIDATION TESTING AS ¿KNOWN¿ POSITIVES BUT THEY GENERATED NON-REACTIVE RESULTS. THE FOLLOWING RESULTS WERE PROVIDED: SID (B)(6) 2021 PRISM CHAGAS REPEAT REACTIVE (1.40, 1.47, 1.39 S/CO) (LOT 15094M700); (B)(6) 2021- ALINITY S NON-REACTIVE (0.54 S/CO); ESA INDETERMINATE. SID (B)(6) PRISM CHAGAS REPEAT REACTIVE (1.78, 2.61, 2.55 S/CO) (LOT 15094M700); 1(B)(6) 2021- ALINITY S NON-REACTIVE (0.02 S/CO); ESA NEGATIVE. SID (B)(6) 2021 PRISM HTLV REPEAT REACTIVE (1.94, 1.88, 1.76 S/CO); 19MAR2021- ALINITY S NON-REACTIVE (0.14 S/CO); MP HTLV BLOT NEGATIVE. SID (B)(6) 2021 PRISM HTLV REPEAT REACTIVE (1.93, 2.01, AND 1.99 S/CO); (B)(6) 2021- ALINITY S NON-REACTIVE (0.13 S/CO); MP HTLV BLOT INDETERMINATE. SID (B)(6) 2021 PRISM HTLV REPEAT REACTIVE (1.25, 1.47, 1.39 S/CO); (B)(6) 2021- ALINITY S NON-REACTIVE (0.16 S/CO); MP HTLV BLOT INVALID. SID (B)(6) 2021 PRISM HCV REPEAT REACTIVE (1.26, 1.20, 1.24 S/CO); (B)(6) 2021- ALINITY S NON-REACTIVE (0.06 S/CO); ORTHO HCV NONREACTIVE, ROCHE NAT NEGATIVE THERE WAS
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11656363 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2019False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED A FALSE REPEAT REACTIVE PRISM HTLV I/HTLV II RESULT ON ONE DONOR. INITIAL TESTING WAS REACTIVE. REPEAT RESULT PROVIDED: (B)(6) 2019 SID (B)(6) = 1.34 S/CO; SAMPLE WAS NAT AND WESTERN BLOT NEGATIVE. PREVIOUS SAME DONOR TESTED ON (B)(6) 2019 SID (B)(6) WAS NONREACTIVE. NO IMPACT TO DONOR MANAGEMENT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9285676 ↗MalfunctionOct 9, 2018False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER OBSERVED (B)(6) PRISM HTLV RESULTS FOR 15 SAMPLES USING 2 LOTS AND 5 ANALYZERS. NO SPECIFIC INITIAL AND REPEAT PRISM DATA WAS PROVIDED, THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES WERE FOUND (B)(6) ON WESTERN BLOT: (B)(6). THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7949055 ↗MalfunctionOct 9, 2018False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER OBSERVED FALSE (B)(6) PRISM HTLV RESULTS FOR 15 SAMPLES USING 2 LOTS AND 5 ANALYZERS. NO SPECIFIC INITIAL AND REPEAT PRISM DATA WAS PROVIDED, THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES WERE FOUND (B)(6) ON WESTERN BLOT: (B)(6). THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7949050 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2018False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY HAVE SEEN AN INCREASE IN REPEAT REACTIVE PRISM HTLV I/II RESULTS. UPON PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING WITH ANOTHER METHOD THE RESULTS ARE NEGATIVE. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC DATA OR STATE HOW MANY SAMPLES WERE INVOLVED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7375129 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2018False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY HAVE SEEN AN INCREASE IN REPEAT REACTIVE PRISM HTLV I/II RESULTS. UPON PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING WITH ANOTHER METHOD THE RESULTS ARE NEGATIVE. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC DATA OR STATE HOW MANY SAMPLES WERE INVOLVED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7375107 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2018False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY HAVE SEEN AN INCREASE IN REPEAT REACTIVE PRISM HTLV I/II RESULTS. UPON PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING WITH ANOTHER METHOD THE RESULTS ARE NEGATIVE. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC DATA OR STATE HOW MANY SAMPLES WERE INVOLVED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7375099 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2018False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY HAVE SEEN AN INCREASE IN REPEAT REACTIVE PRISM HTLV I/II RESULTS. UPON PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING WITH ANOTHER METHOD THE RESULTS ARE NEGATIVE. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC DATA OR STATE HOW MANY SAMPLES WERE INVOLVED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7375093 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2018False Positive Result; False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY HAVE SEEN AN INCREASE IN REPEAT REACTIVE PRISM HTLV I/II RESULTS. UPON PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING WITH ANOTHER METHOD THE RESULTS ARE (B)(6). THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC DATA OR STATE HOW MANY SAMPLES WERE INVOLVED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7374929 ↗MalfunctionNov 8, 2017False Negative Result; False Negative Result
THE ACCOUNT GENERATED A FALSE NEGATIVE PRISM HTLV-I/II (0.26 S/CO) RESULT ON A SERUM SAMPLE. THE PLASMA SAMPLE FROM THE DONOR GENERATED REACTIVE PRISM HTLV-I/II RESULTS ON ANOTHER ANALYZER. THE BLOOD PRODUCTS FROM THE DONATION WERE NOT RELEASED AND WERE DESTROYED. NO SPECIFIC DONOR INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. NO IMPACT TO PATIENT/DONOR MANAGEMENT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7009586 ↗
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page