Skip to content

BD Veritor™ System For Rapid Detection of Flu A+B CLIA-waived kit 256045Recalls & reported problems

Becton, Dickinson And Company · Kit Flu A+B 30 Test Physician Veritor · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This BD Veritor is a rapid test system used to check patients quickly for influenza A and B. Its 253 reports mostly describe incorrect or unclear test results, including suspected wrong positive results and readings where the test line did not appear in the right spot, and some describe an RSV test cartridge packaged in a flu kit. The reports include 16 injuries and no deaths. Reports fell from 117 in the previous 12 months to 8 in the most recent 12 months. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
251
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
16
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 251 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00382902560456), received between Mar 13, 2018 and Feb 23, 2026 — classified as 16 injuries, 235 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (139 reports).

3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K112277, K132259, K132692, K151291, K152870, K160161, K180438, K223016, K232434); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 17 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 4 reportsMar 2024: 2 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 3 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 4 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 92 reportsSep 2025: 16 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 5 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202692
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings139
  • False Positive Result99
  • False Negative Result7
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material4
  • Device Markings/Labelling Problem2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Expiration Date Error1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions248
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient8
  • Chemical Exposure1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 251 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 23, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, ONE (1) FLU A NEGATIVE RESULT WAS OBTAINED FROM A VERITOR ANALYZER. HOWEVER, THE USER VISUALLY READ THE TEST CARTRIDGE AND QUESTIONED THE NEGATIVE RESULT. THE TESTING WAS REPEATED ON THE VERITOR ANALYZER USING LEFTOVER EXTRACTION REAGENT FROM THE INITIAL SAMPLE COLLECTION AND A NEW TEST CARTRIDGE, WHICH PROVIDED A FLU A POSITIVE RESULT. NO CONFIRMATORY TESTING WAS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO HEALTH IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THE ACTION OF VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF A TEST CARTRIDGE IS CONSIDERED OFF-LABEL USE OF THE PRODUCT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24421802 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2026Device Markings/Labelling Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THE CONTENTS INCLUDED ONE (1) RSV CARTRIDGE PACKAGED INSIDE A FOIL WRAPPER LABELED AS A FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED DEVICE. THE RSV CARTRIDGE WAS USED FOR PATIENT TESTING; HOWEVER, THE USER NOTICED THE TEST CARTRIDGE/PACKAGING LABEL DISCREPANCY AND A NEW PATIENT SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED TO PERFORM THE CORRECT TESTING ORDERED BY THE PROVIDER. THERE WERE NO HEALTH IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24305083 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER OBTAINED ONE (1) ERRONEOUS PATIENT RESULT ON A REPEATED (THIRD TIME) SPECIMEN. PER THE CUSTOMER, A POSITIVE RESULT WAS EXPECTED AS THE PATIENT WAS SYMPTOMATIC; HOWEVER, THE RESULT WAS CONSIDERED INCONCLUSIVE AS THE TESTING LINE WAS NOT IN THE CORRECT SPOT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING. THERE WERE NO HEALTH IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THE ACTION OF VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF A TEST CARTRIDGE IS CONSIDERED OFF-LABEL USE OF THE PRODUCT. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT SPECIFY IF THE ANALYTE IN QUESTION WAS FLU A OR FLU B AND NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FROM THE CUSTOMER AFTER SEVERAL FOLLOW UP ATTEMPTS BY BD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24298570 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER OBTAINED ONE (1) ERRONEOUS PATIENT RESULT ON A RECOLLECTED SPECIMEN. PER THE CUSTOMER, A POSITIVE RESULT WAS EXPECTED AS THE PATIENT WAS SYMPTOMATIC; HOWEVER, THE RESULT WAS CONSIDERED INCONCLUSIVE AS THE TESTING LINE WAS NOT IN THE CORRECT SPOT. PATIENT RETESTING OCCURRED A THIRD TIME. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING. THERE WERE NO HEALTH IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THE ACTION OF VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF A TEST CARTRIDGE IS CONSIDERED OFF-LABEL USE OF THE PRODUCT. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT SPECIFY IF THE ANALYTE IN QUESTION WAS FLU A OR FLU B AND NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FROM THE CUSTOMER AFTER SEVERAL FOLLOW UP ATTEMPTS BY BD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24298566 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER OBTAINED ONE (1) ERRONEOUS PATIENT RESULT. PER THE CUSTOMER, A POSITIVE RESULT WAS EXPECTED AS THE PATIENT WAS SYMPTOMATIC; HOWEVER, THE RESULT WAS CONSIDERED INCONCLUSIVE AS THE TESTING LINE WAS NOT IN THE CORRECT SPOT. SAMPLE RECOLLECTION AND RETESTING OCCURRED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PERFORMING CONFIRMATORY TESTING. THERE WERE NO HEALTH IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THE ACTION OF VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF A TEST CARTRIDGE IS CONSIDERED OFF-LABEL USE OF THE PRODUCT. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT SPECIFY IF THE ANALYTE IN QUESTION WAS FLU A OR FLU B AND NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FROM THE CUSTOMER AFTER SEVERAL FOLLOW UP ATTEMPTS BY BD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24298531 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, AN UNSPECIFIED NUMBER OF FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED. IN ADDITION, IT WAS NOTED THAT QC FAILED. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT SPECIFY IF THE ANALYTE IN QUESTION WAS FLU A OR FLU B. THERE WERE NO HEALTH IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23585508 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, AN UNSPECIFIED NUMBER OF FALSE POSITIVE PATIENT RESULTS WERE OBTAINED. THERE WERE NO HEALTH IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER AFTER SEVERAL FOLLOW UP ATTEMPTS BY BD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23393980 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 4, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATOY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22961319 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 4, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATOY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22961313 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATOY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22951800 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATORY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22951798 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATORY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22951797 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATOY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22951796 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATOY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22951795 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAIVED KIT, THERE WAS A FLU A RESULT THAT WAS DISCREPANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE BIOFIRE RESPIRATORY PANEL FLU A RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22951792 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22950024 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22950022 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22950021 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22950018 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22950013 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22950011 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22949782 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    IT WAS REPORTED WHEN USING THE BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, THE CUSTOMER USED OFF LABEL PANBIO¿ COVID-19 AG TEST SWABS FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION, WHICH RESULTED IN FALSE POSITIVE RESULTS. UPON CONFIRMATORY TESTING USING PCR, THE RESULTS WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22939146 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2025Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, CONTAMINATION ON THE TEST DEVICE LED TO A FALSE POSITIVE RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22894421 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2025Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD VERITOR¿ SYSTEM FOR RAPID DETECTION OF FLU A+B CLIA-WAVED KIT, CONTAMINATION ON THE TEST DEVICE LED TO A FALSE POSITIVE RESULT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22894416 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K112277, K132259, K132692, K151291, K152870, K160161, K180438, K223016, K232434. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0630-2022 · Jan 5, 2022 · Open, Classified
    BD Veritor Plus Analyzer - intended to provide rapid test results in near-patient settings. Catalog Number: 256066
  • Z-1313-2019 · Apr 3, 2019 · Terminated
    BD Veritor Plus Analyzer- In-Vitro Diagnostic intended to use with the BD Veritor System Test Devices. Catalog Number: 256066
  • Z-1314-2019 · Apr 3, 2019 · Terminated
    BD Veritor System Reader -In Vitro Diagnostic for use with BD Veritor System Test Kit Devices Catalog Number: 256055

Other Devices detecting influenza A, B, and C virus antigens devices

All Devices detecting influenza A, B, and C virus antigens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page