Skip to content

BD Molecular Swab Collection Kit 443925Recalls & reported problems

Becton, Dickinson And Company · Molecular Swab Collection Kit 100EA · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00382904439255), received between Jan 8, 2025 and Jan 8, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Product Quality Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 8, 2025Product Quality Problem; Product Quality Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED WHILE USING BD MOLECULAR SWAB COLLECTION KIT, ONE SWAB WAS CUT BY A TECHNICIAN TO FIT INSIDE THE TUBE AND THE PATIENT SAMPLE AND REAGENT SPLASHED INTO THEIR EYE. TECHNICIAN WAS TREATED BY OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND RECEIVED ANTIBIOTIC EYE DROPS. THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: "THE BADLY BROKEN SWAB (TOO LARGE) PREVENTED THE BD MAX MACHINE FROM PIPETTING CORRECTLY (BD MAX ERROR AND STOPPAGE OF THE ENTIRE SERIES, WHICH HAD TO BE RESTARTED IN ITS ENTIRETY). THE TECHNICIAN CONCERNED HAD TO OPEN THE TUBE TO RECUT IT. WHEN SHE RECUT THE TUBE, IT SPLASHED INTO HER EYE. THESE WERE PROJECTIONS OF GENITAL SWABS. SHE WAS TREATED BY OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE. DURING OUR SURVEY, OUR USERS TOLD US THAT THEY HAD NOTICED THE RISK OF SPLASHING AND THE PROBLEM OF BREAKAGE WHEN THEY BROKE THE SWABS, WHICH THEY DID BY MOVING THE TUBE AS FAR AWAY FROM THEM AS POSSIBLE, PRECISELY TO AVOID SPLASHING." 1. COULD YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN THE AES THAT HAPPENED? "WHEN THE SAMPLE WAS BEING TAKEN FROM THE BD MAX, THE PLC WENT INTO ALARM BECAUSE THE SWAB WAS TOO LONG. THE TECHNICIAN CUT THE SWAB AND THIS LED TO A SPLASH IN THE EYE. " 2. COULD YOU PLEASE CONFIRM WHETHER THERE WAS ANY SPL

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21106856 ↗

Other Vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis nucleic acid detection system devices

All Vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis nucleic acid detection system devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page