Skip to content

Unistik Touch AT 1444Recalls & reported problems

Owen Mumford Limited · Unistik Touch - Contact Activated Safety Lancet - 28G x 1.8mm - 200 count - sterile single use safety lancet · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00384701444012), received between Aug 11, 2022 and May 9, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fail-Safe Did Not Operate” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 2 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fail-Safe Did Not Operate2
  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • Exposure to Body Fluids2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 9, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    CT FOUND A LANCET THAT WAS DYSFUNCTIONAL AND LEFT THE NEEDLE EXPOSED; CT WAS CHECKING PATIENT'S MORNING BLOOD GLUCOSE. THE BROKEN LANCET WAS DEEMED HAZARDOUS TO BOTH PATIENT AND STAFF. UNCLEAR IF DEVICE WAS ACTUALLY USED ON PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19278924 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 9, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    CT FOUND A LANCET THAT WAS DYSFUNCTIONAL AND LEFT THE NEEDLE EXPOSED; CT WAS CHECKING PATIENT'S MORNING BLOOD GLUCOSE. TEH BROKEN LANCET WAS DEEMED HAZARDOUS TO BOTH PATIENT AND STAFF.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19278888 ↗
  • InjuryAug 11, 2022Fail-Safe Did Not Operate; Fail-Safe Did Not Operate

    HOSPITAL CALLED SALES REP TO REPORT THAT A CAREGIVER ON 10 WEST WAS ACCIDENTALLY STUCK AFTER STICKING THE PATIENT, WHEN THE NEEDLE DID NOT RETRACT. THEY DID NOT SAVE THE LANCET IN QUESTION, IT WENT INTO THE SHARPS. THE FLOOR MANAGER SAID THEY DID NOT KNOW THE LOT NUMBER OF THE LANCET BECAUSE THEY EMPTY THE LANCETS FROM THE BOX THEY COME IN, INTO A PURPLE HOLDER BIN AND THEN DISCARD THE BOX.

    Patient problems: Exposure to Body Fluids

    MAUDE report 15213756 ↗
  • InjuryAug 11, 2022Fail-Safe Did Not Operate; Fail-Safe Did Not Operate

    HOSPITAL IN US CALLED US SALES REP TO REPORT THAT A CAREGIVER ON 10 WEST WAS ACCIDENTALLY STUCK AFTER STICKING THE PATIENT, WHEN THE NEEDLE DID NOT RETRACT. THEY DID NOT SAVE THE LANCET IN QUESTION, IT WENT INTO THE SHARPS. THE FLOOR MANAGER SAID THEY DID NOT KNOW THE LOT NUMBER OF THE LANCET BECAUSE THEY EMPTY THE LANCETS FROM THE BOX THEY COME IN AND PUT INTO A PURPLE HOLDER BIN AND THEN DISCARD THE BOX.

    Patient problems: Exposure to Body Fluids

    MAUDE report 15213713 ↗

Other Lancet, Blood devices

All Lancet, Blood devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page