Skip to content

CRESCENT™ Spinal System 9393007Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SPACER 9393007 CRESCNT SPNAL SYSTM 30X7 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CRESCENT Spinal System (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994187543), received between Feb 10, 2017 and Feb 24, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 24, 2025Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING AN IMPLANTED DI SC. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED AND BROKE. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21444640 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 6, 2022Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PRE-OPERATIVE DIA GNOSIS FOR L2-L3 STENOSIS. PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE USED WAS TLIF. LEVELS IMPLANTED L2/L3. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS GOING TO IMPLANT THE PRODUCT WHICH WAS HELD ON CAGE HOLDER. THE IMPLANT WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO FRAGMENT LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15548583 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2017Break; Break

    PRE-OP: MULTIPLE LEVEL DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE PROCEDURE: TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (TLIF) LEVELS INVOLVED: L5/S1 IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, IMPLANT FRACTURED DURING INSERTION. THE IMPLANT WAS RETRIEVED IN TWO PIECES. A REPLACEMENT IMPLANTATION WAS NOT ATTEMPTED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6321252 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page