Skip to content

VERTEX® Reconstruction System G7755124Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ROD G7755124 ADJ ROD 3.5MM X 220MM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of VERTEX Reconstruction System (34)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994667199), received between Sep 27, 2017 and Nov 23, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Neck Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 23, 2023Migration; Migration

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FOR POSTERIOR OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION. PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS POSTERIOR OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) DUE TO C2 METASTASIS. LEVEL AT WHICH IMPLANT WAS PERFORMED O/C3. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ROD ALIGNMENT CHANGED POSTOPERATIVELY AND THE O-C2 ANGLE CHANGED, RESULTING IN A REOPERATION. DATE OF INITIAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18202922 ↗
  • InjuryAug 8, 2023Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FOR CEREBRAL PALSY. PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS POSTERIOR CERVICAL SPINE FUSION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AFTER C2 TO C6 WERE ALREADY FIXED WITH JJ'S SYNAPSES (ABOUT 10 YEARS AGO), DEPLOYMENT SURGERY WAS PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2023 USING A CRANIAL PLATE (VS). AFTERWARD, THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY THAT SOME KIND OF MALFUNCTION OCCURRED WITH THE ADJUSTABLE ROD. HENCE, IT WAS CONFIRMED BY PERFORMING A REOPERATION. THE JOINT OF THE ADJUSTABLE ROD BROKE, AND IT WAS REPLACED WITH A PREVENT ROD (CCM) (ONLY THE RIGHT SIDE). THE INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT OF CEREBRAL PALSY WAS ACCOMPANIED BY A LOAD APPLIED TO THE ROD, WHICH LED TO THE BREAKAGE OF THE ROD JOINT. PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED FOR THE REMOVAL OF BROKEN ROD. THERE WAS NO FRAGMENT LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. MDT PRODUCT WAS NOT USED IN THE INITIAL SURGERY. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE OVERALL PROCEDURE TIME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17477905 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2017Break; Break

    THE PATIENT UNDERWENT POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION AT OC-C6. POST-OP, THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN AT CERVICAL. PATIENT UNDERWENT X-RAY WHICH REVEALED BREAKAGE OF CONNECTOR PART OF THE ADJUSTABLE ROD AT OC-C2. THIS CAUSED PROTRUSION OF ROD AND PAIN. THE BROKEN ROD WAS SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017. NO INFORMATION REGARDING REVISION SURGERY WAS MADE AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Neck Pain

    MAUDE report 6897711 ↗

Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices

All ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page