SPRINTER® LEGEND SPL20020XRecalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · BLN SPL20020X SPR LEG 2.0X20 RX US M · Class 2
All models of SPRINTER LEGEND (19)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00613994902092), received between Jul 24, 2017 and Jul 24, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deflation Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Deflation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 24, 2017Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem
THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE A SPRINTER LEGEND BALLOON CATHETER TO TREAT A LESION LOCATED IN THE MID OBTUSE MARGINAL (OM) WHICH WAS REPORTED TO BE MODERATELY TORTUOUS, MODERATELY CALCIFIED WITH 90% STENOSIS. NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING, I.E. SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY AND NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED AND NEGATIVE PREP WAS PERFORMED WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WOULD NOT DEFLATE AT THE LESION SITE AND DEFLATION DIFFICULTIES WERE EXPERIENCED. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO PULL BALLOON BACK AND REMOVE AS PROXIMAL ARTERY WAS LARGER THAN THE BALLOON. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY-DEPLOYED STENT, NO RESISTANCE ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE AND NO EXCESSIVE FORCE USED DURING DELIVERY. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6735715 ↗
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page