Infinity Internal Hex System 204111Recalls & reported problems
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · infinity INTERNAL 4.1x11.5MM Ø3.5HD HEX IMPLANT 6AL-4V ELI · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Infinity Internal Hex System (24)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This ACE Surgical Infinity internal hex dental implant has 138 adverse event reports, with no deaths and 138 injuries. Most describe the implant failing to fuse with the bone, with some reports citing poor bone quality, pain and infection. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 138
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 138
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 138 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950004706), received between Nov 24, 2015 and Jun 6, 2025 — classified as 138 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (109 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem109
- Failure to Osseointegrate97
- Insufficient Device Problem Information9
- Loss of Osseointegration7
- Patient Device Interaction Problem5
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure2
- Microbial Contamination of Device1
- Missing Value Reason1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant138
- Pain29
- Unspecified Infection10
- Numbness8
- Fistula2
- Swelling2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 138 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 6, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IMPLANT #9 SPINNED WITH SLIGHT INFECTION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 22158918 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryOct 19, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryAug 22, 2023Microbial Contamination of Device; Microbial Contamination of Device
CONTAMINATION OF STERILE IMPLANT SURFACE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17599488 ↗InjuryAug 21, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryAug 9, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
PAIN & MOBILITY 1.5 YEARS AFTER FINAL RESTORATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 17494308 ↗InjuryAug 1, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
InjuryJul 13, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
InjuryDec 22, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS NOT ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. MOBILITY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 13059863 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2021Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO ONE TO FIVE YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ALSO ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. MOBILITY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 13059856 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE IS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12984650 ↗InjuryOct 18, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12647541 ↗InjuryOct 4, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN, PERI-IMPLANTITIS , BLEEDING, INFECTION, NUMBNESS AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain
MAUDE report 12567722 ↗InjuryOct 4, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12567719 ↗InjuryOct 4, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, BLEEDING, INFECTION AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12567710 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12290901 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS ALLERGIES (PENICILLIN) AND IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 12290860 ↗InjuryJun 21, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12035128 ↗InjuryJun 8, 2021Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
BONE QUALITY WAS IDENTIFIED AS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11956887 ↗InjuryJun 2, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate
BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS NOT ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11923264 ↗InjuryMay 28, 2021Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED AT SURGERY. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11904042 ↗InjuryMay 25, 2021Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS POOR (III). TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11879187 ↗InjuryApr 28, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11737601 ↗InjuryMar 5, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11423216 ↗InjuryMar 5, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/ BONE QUANTITY, NUMBNESS AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness
MAUDE report 11423188 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page