Infinity Internal Hex System 204713Recalls & reported problems
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · infinity INTERNAL 4.7x13MM Ø4.5HD HEX IMPLANT 6AL-4V ELI · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Infinity Internal Hex dental implant is a root-form implant placed in the jaw to hold dental restorations. Reports mostly describe implants that did not bond with the bone and became loose or failed, sometimes with pain. There are 24 reports that name its identifier, with no deaths and 24 injuries. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 24
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 24
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 24 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950004768), received between Jan 11, 2016 and Jul 27, 2023 — classified as 24 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (19 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem19
- Failure to Osseointegrate16
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Patient Device Interaction Problem2
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant24
- Pain2
Recent adverse event reports
The 24 most recent of 24 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 27, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryMay 30, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
InjuryDec 22, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO ONE YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. MOBILITY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 13059847 ↗InjuryOct 4, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12567737 ↗InjuryFeb 2, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11265745 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10842695 ↗InjuryNov 8, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10806315 ↗InjuryNov 8, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS DIABETES.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10806311 ↗InjuryNov 8, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10806304 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9995499 ↗InjuryFeb 20, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE (ALLOGRAFT) WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 9733018 ↗InjuryAug 1, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8849802 ↗InjuryJan 25, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE "PORSTHETIC" RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8278821 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8163832 ↗InjuryNov 27, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8105183 ↗InjurySep 26, 2018Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, BLEEDING AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS DIABETES MELLITUS AND DID CHEMOTHERAPY AT TIME OF IMPLANT.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 7909374 ↗InjuryDec 20, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMATY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 7135271 ↗InjurySep 6, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER AND HAS DIABETES MELLITUS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6844448 ↗InjurySep 5, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER AND HAS XEROSTOMIA.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6841431 ↗InjurySep 5, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YR AFTER FINAL PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6841410 ↗InjuryAug 15, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5875842 ↗InjuryMar 15, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED BUT OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT. AUGMENTATION WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5502863 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE. NO OSSEOINTEGRATION 0-3 MONTHS BEFORE DISCOVERY. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5402063 ↗InjuryJan 11, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE. NO PRIMARY STABILITY AND NO OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. PATIENT WAS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5358345 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page