Skip to content

TRICAM Dental Implant System 304313Recalls & reported problems

Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · TRICAM 4.3X13MM 4.3HD INTERNAL IMPLANT 6Al-4V ELI NOBEL CLONE · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TRICAM Dental Implant System (16)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Ace Surgical TRICAM implant is placed into bone. Most of the 80 reports describe the implant not bonding with bone, losing bone around it and becoming loose. The reports include 80 injuries and no deaths. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
80
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
80
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 80 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950005246), received between Dec 1, 2015 and Jun 8, 2024 — classified as 80 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (71 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 2 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem71
  • Failure to Osseointegrate52
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information4
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem2
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant77
  • Pain12
  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Swelling4
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem2
  • Numbness1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 80 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 8, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT PROGRESSIVELY LOST BONE AND BECAME MOBILE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 19494826 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT PROGRESSIVELY LOST BONE AND BECAME MOBILE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 19494825 ↗
  • InjuryMar 28, 2024Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    IMPLANT DID NOT THREAD IN BONE. CHANGED TO A LARGER SIZE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 19000186 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    PATIENT HAD IMPLANT RETAINED DENTURE - RECENTLY DEVELOPED MOBILITY & IMPLANT WAS REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17822025 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    SAME DAY SPINNER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17716959 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    NO INTERGRATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17203378 ↗
  • InjuryJun 21, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    ASYMPTOMATIC WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12035192 ↗
  • InjuryMay 5, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    ASINTOMATICA WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11777060 ↗
  • InjuryApr 22, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    ASYMPTOMATIC WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER AND HAS DIABETES.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11711826 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11648044 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11648040 ↗
  • InjuryNov 16, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10842610 ↗
  • InjuryMay 7, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10032706 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    NUMBNESS WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness

    MAUDE report 9995518 ↗
  • InjuryNov 18, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9335320 ↗
  • InjuryNov 18, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9335317 ↗
  • InjuryOct 24, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. MOBILITY AND PERI-IMPLANTITIS WERE REPORTED. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9232371 ↗
  • InjuryOct 24, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 9232362 ↗
  • InjuryOct 4, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY AND ASYMPTOMATIC WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE (L-PRF) WAS PERFORMED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9155305 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, PAIN, PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND POOR ORAL HYGIENE WAS REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS A PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 9151107 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    PAIN WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 8849817 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8849814 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8849813 ↗
  • InjuryJul 16, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE (BIO-OSS) WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8792492 ↗
  • InjuryJun 27, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8738611 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page