TRICAM Dental Implant System 304316Recalls & reported problems
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · TRICAM 4.3X16MM 4.3HD INTERNAL IMPLANT 6Al-4V ELI NOBEL CLONE · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TRICAM Dental Implant System (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950005253), received between Nov 24, 2015 and Jun 21, 2021 — classified as 10 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem8
- Failure to Osseointegrate6
- Missing Value Reason1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant10
- Numbness3
- Unspecified Infection2
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 21, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12035157 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN, BLEEDING, SWELLING, NUMBNESS, INFECTION AND FISTULA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9995500 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION, POOR ORAL HYGIENE, NUMBNESS AND ASYMPTOMATIC WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9995497 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
NUMBNESS AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT HAS AN UNCONTROLLED ENDOCRINE DISEASE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness
MAUDE report 9995491 ↗InjuryMay 10, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8601617 ↗InjuryApr 27, 2017Missing Value Reason; Missing Value Reason
BLEEDING AND ASYMPTOMATIC WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT IS ALLERGIC TO AMOXICILLIN.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6525501 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND BONE LOSS WAS REPORTED. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. NO OSSEOINTEGRATION OF THE IMPLANT 6 MONTHS AFTER FINAL RESTORATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6130043 ↗InjuryMar 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. NO OSSEOINTEGRATION WITHIN 3-6 MONTHS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5471792 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2015Failure to Osseointegrate
INFECTION WAS REPORTED AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE. TIME OF LOSS WAS 0-1 MONTHS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5319939 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2015Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION AND MOBILITY WAS REPORTED AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. NO AUGMENTATION WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. BONE QUALITY AT TIME OF FAILURE WAS REPORTED AS TYPE II.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5247563 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page