Skip to content

TRICAM Dental Implant System 305008Recalls & reported problems

Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · TRICAM 5.0X8MM 5HD INTERNAL IMPLANT 6Al-4V ELI NOBEL CLONE · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TRICAM Dental Implant System (16)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This is a ACE Surgical Supply TRICAM endosseous dental implant, a root-form screw placed into the jaw to support a tooth replacement. The 46 reports mostly describe the implant failing to fuse with the surrounding bone, sometimes with pain, swelling, drainage or fistula, and a few mention mobility or bleeding; all 46 involved injuries and no deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
46
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
46
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 46 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950005260), received between Nov 24, 2015 and Sep 30, 2024 — classified as 46 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (32 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem32
  • Failure to Osseointegrate23
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information7
  • Device Issue1
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant45
  • Pain7
  • Unspecified Infection6
  • Fistula5
  • Numbness4
  • Swelling2
  • Swelling/ Edema2

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 46 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 30, 2024Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    SAME DAY SPINNER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20340176 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 13, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IMPLANT DID NOT OSSEOINTEGRATE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18698094 ↗
  • InjuryJan 24, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    LOST OSSEOINTEGRATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18575172 ↗
  • InjuryAug 16, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    FAILURE TO INTEGRATE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17560387 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    FAILURE TO INTEGRATE WITH PAIN, SWELLING

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17455007 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    LIKELY INADEQUATE TIME FOR GRAFT MATURATION (B)(6) 2022 TO (B)(6) 2022. BY (B)(6) 2022 EVEN AFTER ANTIBIOTIC, FISTULA AND SUPPURATION NOT RESOLVED. EXIMPLANTATION (B)(6) 2022.

    Patient problems: Fistula

    MAUDE report 16902326 ↗
  • InjuryDec 13, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    BRUXISM, SWELLING AND INFECTION WERE REPORTED. THE BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANTATION WAS TYPE I. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WERE NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12984667 ↗
  • InjuryOct 19, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    FISTULA, PAIN, MOBILITY, BLEEDING, AND SWELLING WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Pain

    MAUDE report 12657217 ↗
  • InjuryMay 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11761150 ↗
  • InjuryMay 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, POOR ORAL HYGIENE AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11761148 ↗
  • InjuryApr 22, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11711790 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY, PAIN, BLEEDING, SWELLING, NUMBNESS AND ASINTOMATICA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 11141324 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    ASINTOMATICA WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11141319 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10267724 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    NUMBNESS, SWELLING AND FISTULA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Numbness

    MAUDE report 9995516 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    NUMBNESS, BLEEDING, FISTULA, ASYMPTOMATIC AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT HAS DIABETES.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Numbness

    MAUDE report 9995506 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. NUMBNESS, SWELLING, FISTULA AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Numbness; Swelling

    MAUDE report 9543640 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INFECTION AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9151103 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. POOR ORAL HYGIENE WAS REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS A BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER AND IS A SMOKER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9151102 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 8431399 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MOBILITY AND ASYMPTOMATIC WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8330402 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8330401 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 4, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8301928 ↗
  • InjuryDec 14, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8163829 ↗
  • InjuryNov 28, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INFECTION WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8110136 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page