TRICAM Dental Implant System 305008Recalls & reported problems
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · TRICAM 5.0X8MM 5HD INTERNAL IMPLANT 6Al-4V ELI NOBEL CLONE · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TRICAM Dental Implant System (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This is a ACE Surgical Supply TRICAM endosseous dental implant, a root-form screw placed into the jaw to support a tooth replacement. The 46 reports mostly describe the implant failing to fuse with the surrounding bone, sometimes with pain, swelling, drainage or fistula, and a few mention mobility or bleeding; all 46 involved injuries and no deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 46
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 46
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 46 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950005260), received between Nov 24, 2015 and Sep 30, 2024 — classified as 46 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (32 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem32
- Failure to Osseointegrate23
- Insufficient Device Problem Information7
- Device Issue1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant45
- Pain7
- Unspecified Infection6
- Fistula5
- Numbness4
- Swelling2
- Swelling/ Edema2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 46 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 30, 2024Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
InjuryFeb 13, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryJan 24, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
InjuryAug 16, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryAug 3, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryMay 10, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
LIKELY INADEQUATE TIME FOR GRAFT MATURATION (B)(6) 2022 TO (B)(6) 2022. BY (B)(6) 2022 EVEN AFTER ANTIBIOTIC, FISTULA AND SUPPURATION NOT RESOLVED. EXIMPLANTATION (B)(6) 2022.
Patient problems: Fistula
MAUDE report 16902326 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
BRUXISM, SWELLING AND INFECTION WERE REPORTED. THE BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANTATION WAS TYPE I. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WERE NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12984667 ↗InjuryOct 19, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
FISTULA, PAIN, MOBILITY, BLEEDING, AND SWELLING WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Pain
MAUDE report 12657217 ↗InjuryMay 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11761150 ↗InjuryMay 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, POOR ORAL HYGIENE AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11761148 ↗InjuryApr 22, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11711790 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY, PAIN, BLEEDING, SWELLING, NUMBNESS AND ASINTOMATICA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 11141324 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
ASINTOMATICA WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11141319 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10267724 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
NUMBNESS, SWELLING AND FISTULA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Numbness
MAUDE report 9995516 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
NUMBNESS, BLEEDING, FISTULA, ASYMPTOMATIC AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. PATIENT HAS DIABETES.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Numbness
MAUDE report 9995506 ↗InjuryJan 3, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. NUMBNESS, SWELLING, FISTULA AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Numbness; Swelling
MAUDE report 9543640 ↗InjuryOct 3, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9151103 ↗InjuryOct 3, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. POOR ORAL HYGIENE WAS REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS A BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER AND IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9151102 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 8431399 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MOBILITY AND ASYMPTOMATIC WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8330402 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8330401 ↗InjuryFeb 4, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8301928 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8163829 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8110136 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page