TRICAM Dental Implant System 305011Recalls & reported problems
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · TRICAM 5.0X11.5MM 5HD INTERNAL IMPLANT 6Al-4V ELI NOBEL CLONE · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TRICAM Dental Implant System (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This is a Tricam root-form dental implant made by Ace Surgical Supply. The 27 reports mostly describe the implant not bonding with the surrounding bone, so it becomes loose and has to be removed, with reports also mentioning pain, swelling, infection, a fistula, and numbness. All 27 reports are injuries and no deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 27
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 27
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 27 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950005284), received between Feb 10, 2016 and May 18, 2026 — classified as 27 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (19 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem19
- Failure to Osseointegrate17
- Insufficient Device Problem Information3
- Loss of Osseointegration2
- Device Issue1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant26
- Pain8
- Swelling5
- Unspecified Infection3
- Fistula2
- Numbness2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 27 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 18, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryFeb 7, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
DID NOT OSSEOINTEGRATE AFTER 8 WEEK HEALING PERIOD.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18659547 ↗InjuryAug 17, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryAug 16, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
InjuryJun 17, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY, INCREASED SENSITIVITY, INFLAMMATION AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12020293 ↗InjuryMar 29, 2021Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND BONE LOSS WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE (ALLOGRAFT) WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11581043 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11141322 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
ASYMPTOMATIC WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11120766 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND SWELLING WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Swelling
MAUDE report 10032720 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/ BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9995512 ↗InjuryNov 15, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9330671 ↗InjuryNov 15, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 9330668 ↗InjuryAug 1, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
PAIN, BLEEDING, INFECTION AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8849811 ↗InjuryApr 10, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8498752 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
BONE QUALITY/BONE "QUANITTY" WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8110148 ↗InjuryJul 23, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
SWELLING AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED (FREEZE DRIED DEMINERALIZED BONE).
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Swelling
MAUDE report 7710703 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MOBILITY, PAIN AND BRUXISM WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 7052805 ↗InjuryNov 2, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN WAS REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 6996211 ↗InjuryOct 16, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
PAIN, SWELLING, NUMBNESS, ASINTOMATICA, AND FISTULA WAS REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT TIME OF SURGERY. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Pain; Swelling
MAUDE report 6951951 ↗InjurySep 6, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN, BLEEDING, SWELLING, NUMBNESS AND FISTULA WAS REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain; Swelling
MAUDE report 6845029 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION, MOBILITY AND FISTULA WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6829684 ↗InjuryMar 23, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN, SWELLING, BLEEDING, INFECTION AND NUMBNESS WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain; Swelling; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6429868 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
NO OSSEOINTEGRATION OF THE IMPLANT AFTER DISCOVERY BUT BEFORE FINAL RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT SURGERY TYPE IV.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6173281 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2016Device Issue; Device Issue
PAIN WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE BETWEEN TYPE II & TYPE III. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PATIENT REQUESTED REMOVAL OF IMPLANT DUE TO PAIN.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 5741283 ↗InjuryJun 2, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. NO OSSEOINTEGRATION OF THE IMPLANT 1-3 MONTHS AFTER FINAL RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5695370 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page