Skip to content

Infinity External Hex Implant System 403308Recalls & reported problems

Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · INFINITY EXTERNAL 3.3X8.0MM Ø3.5HD HEX IMPLANT TI CP GRADE 4 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Infinity External Hex Implant System (16)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950005352), received between Jan 11, 2016 and May 10, 2018 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Failure to Osseointegrate2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • Pain2
  • Fistula1
  • Numbness1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 10, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 7504245 ↗
  • InjuryApr 26, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    BLEEDING, PAIN, INFECTION, NUMBNESS, FISTULA AND SYMPTOMATICA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Numbness; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7464440 ↗
  • InjuryJan 11, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 5357866 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page