Infinity External Hex Implant System 404713Recalls & reported problems
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · INFINITY EXTERNAL 4.75X13MM Ø5.0HD HEX IMPLANT TI CP GRADE 4 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Infinity External Hex Implant System (16)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950005536), received between Dec 23, 2015 and Jan 25, 2019 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem8
- Failure to Osseointegrate3
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant9
- Unspecified Infection2
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 25, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
ASYMPTOMATIC AND INFECTION WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. "AUMENTATION" PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8278817 ↗InjuryJan 25, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8278812 ↗InjurySep 22, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
ASYMPTOMATIC, ASYMPTOMATIC AND BONE LOSS WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6888438 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. NO OSSEOINTEGRATION OF THE IMPLANT 1-3 MONTHS AFTER FINAL RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT SURGERY TYPE II. PATIENT IS A SMOKER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6173271 ↗InjuryAug 19, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. PRIMARY STABILITY OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. IT WAS REPORTED INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY AND BONE WAS TOO THIN ON FACIAL AND COULD NOT SEE SOME THREADS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5890608 ↗InjuryJun 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
InjuryMar 9, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED BUT OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT. ACHIEVED. ASYMPTOMATIC AND MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. PAIN ALSO WAS REPORTED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5488975 ↗InjuryFeb 4, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
InjuryDec 23, 2015Failure to Osseointegrate
MOBILITY AND PAIN WAS REPORTED AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE. NO OSSEOINTEGRATION BEFORE 3-6 MONTHS OF FINAL DENTAL RESTORATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 5324977 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page