Skip to content

Infinity Internal Hex System 214710Recalls & reported problems

Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · infinity (PS) INTERNAL HEX 4.7 x 10mm, 3.5 PLATFORM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Infinity Internal Hex System (24)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950007189), received between May 7, 2020 and Jan 25, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate4
  • Osseointegration Problem2
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 25, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18581304 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    UPON PLACEMENT, WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE CARRIER UNSUCCESSFUL. THE IMPLANT HAD TO BE BACKED OUT OF THE SURGICAL SITE AND ANOTHER IMPLANT PLACED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16975748 ↗
  • InjuryJun 9, 2021Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY WAS IDENTIFIED AS TYPE II AND TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11965894 ↗
  • InjuryJun 2, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate

    BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS NOT ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY (BONE GRAFT AND 1 COLLAGEN PLUG).

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11923232 ↗
  • InjuryJan 5, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE (ALLOGRAFT) WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11120267 ↗
  • InjuryMay 7, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10032724 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page