Skip to content

Infinity Internal Hex System 214711Recalls & reported problems

Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · infinity (PS) INTERNAL HEX 4.7 x 11.5mm, 3.5 PLATFORM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Infinity Internal Hex System (24)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950007196), received between Sep 1, 2016 and Jul 25, 2023 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate4
  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant7
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 25, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    PROBLEM OSSEOINTEGRATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17393368 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    SAME DAY SPINNER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17062705 ↗
  • InjuryMar 23, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    SAME DAY SPINNER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16598821 ↗
  • InjuryOct 21, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE (ALLOGRAFT) WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12677185 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11648042 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8447521 ↗
  • InjurySep 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    INFECTION WAS REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE III. IMPLANT DID NOT ACHIEVE INTEGRATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 5921059 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page