Atellica CH CYSC_2 11097647Recalls & reported problems
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. · Cystatin C_2 (CYSC_2) Atellica CH - RGT 800T · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00630414236919), received between Sep 18, 2025 and Sep 18, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings6
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO SIEMENS THEY OBTAINED DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) RESULTS ON TWO (2) PATIENT SAMPLES WHEN PROCESSED ON AN ATELLICA CH 930 ANALYZER. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH RESULTS ARE CORRECT OR IF ANY OF THE RESULTS WERE REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO KNOWN REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23088239 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO SIEMENS THEY OBTAINED A DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) RESULT ON ONE (1) PATIENT SAMPLE WHEN PROCESSED ON AN ATELLICA CH 930 ANALYZER. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH RESULT IS CORRECT OR IF ANY OF THE RESULTS WERE REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO KNOWN REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23088100 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO SIEMENS THEY OBTAINED A DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) RESULT ON ONE (1) PATIENT SAMPLE WHEN PROCESSED ON AN ATELLICA CH 930 ANALYZER. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPROCESSED ON AN ALTERNATE ATELLICA CH 930 ANALYZER. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH RESULT IS CORRECT OR IF ANY OF THE RESULTS WERE REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO KNOWN REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23088070 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO SIEMENS THEY OBTAINED ONE (1) DISCORDANT DEPRESSED CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULT WHEN PROCESSED ON AN ATELLICA CH 930 ANALYZER. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS REPROCESSED ON THE SAME ATELLICA CH ANALYZER TWICE AND THE RESULTS WERE HIGHER. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH RESULT IS CORRECT OR IF ANY OF THE RESULTS WERE REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO KNOWN REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23085901 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO SIEMENS THEY OBTAINED ONE (1) DISCORDANT DEPRESSED CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULT WHEN PROCESSED ON AN ATELLICA CH 930 ANALYZER. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS PROCESSED ON AN ALTERNATE ATELLICA CH ANALYZER AND THE RESULT WAS HIGHER. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH RESULT IS CORRECT OR IF ANY OF THE RESULTS WERE REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S). THERE ARE NO KNOWN REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23085739 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO SIEMENS THEY OBTAINED ONE (1) DISCORDANT DEPRESSED CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULT WHEN PROCESSED ON AN ATELLICA CH 930 ANALYZER. THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS PROCESSED ON AN ALTERNATE ATELLICA CH ANALYZER AND THE RESULT WAS HIGHER. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH RESULT IS CORRECT OR IF ANY OF THE RESULTS WERE REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN(S).THERE ARE NO KNOWN REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT CYSTATIN C_2 (CYSC_2) PATIENT SAMPLE RESULTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23085697 ↗
Other TEST, CYSTATIN C devices
- CYSC CYS4004Randox Laboratories Limited · Test, Cystatin C1 recall0 reports
- Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 6600263190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · TEST, CYSTATIN C4 reports
- Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 08105596190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · TEST, CYSTATIN C2 reports
- Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 6600239190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · TEST, CYSTATIN C1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page