Resolute Integrity™ RSINT35030UXRecalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · Stent RSINT35030UX MicroTrac 3.50X30RX · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Resolute Integrity (52)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169037274), received between Dec 19, 2016 and May 11, 2017 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Expiration Issue” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Expiration Issue2
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 11, 2017Device Expiration Issue; Device Expiration Issue
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A RESOLUTE INTEGRITY RX DRUG ELUTING STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT TO TREAT IN-STENT RE-STENOSIS OF A NON-MDT STENT. (EVEROLIMUS) THE RESOLUTE INTEGRITY STENT WAS IMPLANTED 18 DAYS POST ITS EXPIRY DATE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. PATIENT IS CURRENTLY OK
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6559630 ↗MalfunctionMar 28, 2017Device Expiration Issue; Device Expiration Issue
IT IS REPORTED THAT A RESOLUTE INTEGRITY DRUG ELUTING STENT WAS USED IN THE PATIENT 8 DAYS POST EXPIRATION DATE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6438649 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2016Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN IMPLANTED A RESOLUTE INTEGRITY RX DRUG ELUTING STENT. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. NO EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS USED DURING DEVICE DELIVERY. THE STENT WAS EXPANDED EVENLY ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH. SUFFICIENT TIME WAS GIVEN TO ALLOW THE BALLOON TO FULLY DEFLATE PRIOR TO ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER STENT WAS DEPLOYED RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED REMOVING THE BALLOON FROM THE STENT . THE BALLOON SEEMED STUCK AND IT WAS REPORTED THAT FORCE WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE IT. NO DAMAGE TO THE DEPLOYED STENT AND NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6185364 ↗
Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page