CLYDESDALE PTC™ Spinal System 4986040Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · CAGE 4986040 CDALE PTC 18MM 6 DEG 10X40 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CLYDESDALE PTC Spinal System (28)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169190740), received between Nov 8, 2018 and Mar 11, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Mechanical Problem1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Blood Loss1
- Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 11, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING L2/3/4 OLIF FOR SPINAL CANAL STENOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS AND VERTEBRAL FRACTURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT CAGE SIZE WAS SELECTED AS A TRIAL, AND WHEN THE PHYSICIAN OPENED THE CAGE AND INSTALLED IT TO THE INSERTER, IT COULD NOT BE PROPERLY INSTALLED. IT WAS TRIED AGAIN, BUT IT WAS INSTALLED AT AN ANGLE, SO A NEW CAGE WAS OPENED. THERE WAS NO PARTICULAR ABNORMALITY AT THE TIP OF THE INSERTER, SO WHEN A NEW CAGE WAS INSTALLED, IT WAS PROPERLY INSTALLED AND THE SURGERY WAS CONTINUED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. INSERTER WAS CONNECTED DIAGNALLY WITH THE CAGE.THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21571357 ↗InjurySep 21, 2023Use of Device Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Use of Device Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED TO THE CUSTOMER AND IT WON'T BE RETURNED TO BU.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17787150 ↗InjuryNov 8, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FOR THIS PROCEDURE: LUMBAR KYPHOSCOLIOSIS TYPE OF PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE USED: OLIF (OBLIQUE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION) LEVELS IMPLANTED: L2/3/4 IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRA-OP, AFTER IMPLANTATION WAS COMPLETED, WHEN PERFORMING HEMOSTASIS TO THE BLEEDING FROM THE END PLATE OF VERTEBRAL BODY, THE SOMATIC ARTERY WAS INJURED CAUSING BLOOD LOSS OF ABOUT 500-600ML. HEMOSTASIS WAS PERFORMED WITH FACILITY OWNED TWEEZER AND GAUZE. THE WOUND WAS CLOSED BY SPRINKLING THE FLOSEAL AFTER HEMOSTASIS WITH ASTRICTION OR CAUTERIZATION. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINUTES IN OVERALL PROCEDURE TIME AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NO EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION WAS REQUIRED FOR THE PATIENT DUE TO THE ADVERSE EVENT. NO MALFUNCTION WAS REPORTED FOR THE PRODUCT; AND THE INJURY WAS NOT CAUSED DUE TO THE PRODUCT. POSTERIOR FUSION WAS PLANNED TO BE PERFORMED; HOWEVER NO INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IF IT WAS ACTUALLY PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Blood Loss; Injury
MAUDE report 8050174 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page