CLYDESDALE PTC™ Spinal System 4922250Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · CAGE 4922250 CDALE PTC 22MM 12 DEG 12X50 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CLYDESDALE PTC Spinal System (28)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169191327), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Jul 26, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 26, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT OBLIQUE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AT L4-L5 DUE TO LUMBAR KYPHOSIS. INTRA-OP, POSTERIOR PART OF THE CAGE BROKE WHILE INSERTING IT USING THE INSERTER. THE BROKEN PART OF THE CAGE WAS REMOVED; AND THE REST WAS LEFT INDWELT IN THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8830675 ↗MalfunctionMar 8, 2019Break; Break
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FOR THIS PROCEDURE: CAGE BACKED OUT PROCEDURE: OBLIQUE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (OLIF) LEVELS IMPLANTED: L2/3/4 IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRA-OP, DURING REVISION SURGERY THE POSTERIOR PART OF THE CAGE BROKE ON INSERTION. WHILE REMOVING THE INSERTER, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE NEWLY INSERTED CAGE BROKE. THE PRODUCT CAME IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8402928 ↗InjuryJan 7, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS PROCEDURE: L1-5 ANTEROPOSTERIOR FUSION. L1-5 OBLIQUE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (OLIF), PERFORMED PPS ON POSTERIOR SIDE. LEVEL IMPLANTED: L1-5 INTRAOPERATIVE BLEEDING VOLUME: 3300CC IN TOTAL (2500CC DURING OLIF, 800CC DURING PPS) IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRA-OP, AFTER PLACING THE CAGE AT L4/5, THE CAGE PROCEEDED TO THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE. IT WAS CONFIRMED BY THE FRONTAL IMAGE BY INTRAOPERATIVE C ARM THAT 3/4 OF THE CAGE PROTRUDED TO THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE. CAGE WAS TRIED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE INVADING SIDE, BUT IT DID NOT MOVE AT ALL. AT THIS TIME, THE BLOOD PRESSURE DROPPED NOTICEABLY AND REMOVAL FROM THE INVADING SIDE WAS GIVEN UP. BECAUSE RISKS SUCH AS BLEEDING WERE ALSO CONSIDERED, SO THE WOUND WAS CLOSED AND CONFIRMED BY CT. THE OVERALL OPERATION TIME WAS DELAYED ABOUT TWO AND A HALF HOURS. ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BY CHANGING THE PATIENTS POSITIONS FROM THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE AND SINCE THERE WAS NO PROBLEM IN THE CAGE ITSELF, THE CAGE WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE PATIENT AS IT WAS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8224514 ↗MalfunctionMar 14, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT OBLIQUE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION - OLIF AT L3/4 DUE TO DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS. INTRA-OP, WHEN TRYING TO PULL THE CAGE OUT AFTER INSERTING IT INTO THE INTERVERTEBRAL SPACE, IT BROKE. THE CAGE WAS BROKEN FROM THE THREAD PART, AND IT REMAINED THERE EVEN THOUGH IT WAS TRIED TO BE REMOVED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7337817 ↗MalfunctionFeb 23, 2018Break; Break
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FOR THIS PROCEDURE: SPINAL CANAL STENOSIS TYPE OF PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE USED : LUMBAR ANTEROPOSTERIOR FUSION LEVELS IMPLANTED: L2-4 IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRA-OP, AFTER INSERTING THE CAGE, THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT LOOKED LIKE SPRING, CAME OUT FROM THE CONNECTION PART BETWEEN INSERTER AND CAGE. IT APPEARED TO BE A FRAGMENT OF SCREW THREAD OF THE CAGE. NO FRAGMENTS REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7292425 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2017Break; Break
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: SPINAL CANAL STENOSIS(L4-L5). THE TYPE OF PROCEDURE: OLIF (OBLIQUE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION). LEVELS IMPLANTED: L4-L5. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, THE THREAD OF THE CAGE WAS BROKEN DUE TO WHICH THE CAGE COULD NOT BE HELD WITH THE INSERTER. THE SURGEON PLACED THE CAGE IN PROPER POSITION WITH A REMOVER. DUE TO THE EVENT THERE WAS DELAY IN OVERALL PROCEDURE TIME OF LESS THAN 60 MIN. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7017947 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page