Skip to content

NC SPRINTER® NCSP2515XRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · BALLOON NCSP2515X NCSPRINTER RX M US · Class 2

All models of NC SPRINTER (13)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169282315), received between Mar 13, 2020 and Apr 28, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2
  • Fracture2
  • Deflation Problem1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2025Burst Container or Vessel; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Burst Container or Vessel; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING ONE NC SPRINTER BALLOON CATHETER, A BALLOON BURST OCCURRED DURING BALLOON INFLATION AT 15 ATMS. THE LESION WAS SEVERELY TORTUOUS, SEVERELY CALCIFIED WITH 90% STENOSIS IN THE MID TO PROXIMAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. NEGATIVE PREP WAS PERFORMED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED DURING DELIVERY. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21916613 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2024Burst Container or Vessel; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation; Burst Container or Vessel; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation

    AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE AN NC SPRINTER CORONARY BALLOON CATHETER TO TREAT A NON-TORTUOUS, NON-CALCIFIED LESION WITH 40-50% STENOSIS IN THE MID RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THERE WERE ISSUES NOTED REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES. NEGATIVE PREP WAS PERFORMED WITH NO ISSUES. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED DURING DELIVERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON DEFLATION DIFFICULTIES OCCURRED DURING SUBSEQUENT INFLATION. THE DEVICE WOULD NOT DEFLATE AT THE LESION SITE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THERE WERE REMOVAL DIFFICULTIES. IT WAS DETAILED THAT A 6F GUIDE CATHETER WAS ENGAGED TO THE RCA. A 0.014 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE WAS UNABLE TO PASS THE LESION, BUT A DIFFERENT 0.014 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE SUCCESSFULLY CROSSED THE POSTEROLATERAL BRANCH (PLB) LESION. PRE-DILATATION OF THE PLB WAS PERFORMED USING A 2.0X15MM NON-MEDTRONIC BALLOON AT 12 ATM. RESIDUAL STENOSIS OF THE PLB WAS STENTED WITH A 2.25X38MM NON-MEDTRONIC STENT AT 14 ATM. STENT POST-DILATION WAS BEING PERFORMED USING THE 2.5X15MM NC SPRINTER BALLOON UP

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20640450 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 13, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    DURING A PROCEDURE TWO NC SPRINTER RX PTCA BALLOON CATHETERS WERE INTENDED TO BE USED. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING OF EITHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE FIRST NC SPRINTER DEVICE FROM THE HOOP. THE DEVICES WERE INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. THE LUERS OF BOTH NC SPRINTERS WERE NOT INSPECTED PRIOR TO ATTACHING TO THE NON MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE. NO DIFFICULTIES WERE NOTED WHEN ATTACHING THE LUERS OF BOTH NC SPRINTERS DIRECTLY TO THE INFLATION DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BOTH BALLOONS WERE FOUND TO BE LEAKING AT THE LUER. THE CRACK WAS NOT NOTED PRIOR TO ATTACHING THE LUER OF BOTH NC SPRINTER DEVICES TO THE INFLATION DEVICE. THE LEAK WAS NOTICED WHEN TRYING TO INFLATE THE BALLOON WHILE IN THE PATIENT. NEITHER BALLOON WOULD INFLATE. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9828683 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 13, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    DURING A PROCEDURE TWO NC SPRINTER RX PTCA BALLOON CATHETERS WERE INTENDED TO BE USED. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING OF EITHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE FIRST NC SPRINTER DEVICE FROM THE HOOP. THE DEVICES WERE INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. THE LUERS OF BOTH NC SPRINTERS WERE NOT INSPECTED PRIOR TO ATTACHING TO THE NON MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE. NO DIFFICULTIES WERE NOTED WHEN ATTACHING THE LUERS OF BOTH NC SPRINTERS DIRECTLY TO THE INFLATION DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BOTH BALLOONS WERE FOUND TO BE LEAKING AT THE LUER. THE CRACK WAS NOT NOTED PRIOR TO ATTACHING THE LUER OF BOTH NC SPRINTER DEVICES TO THE INFLATION DEVICE. THE LEAK WAS NOTICED WHEN TRYING TO INFLATE THE BALLOON WHILE IN THE PATIENT. NEITHER BALLOON WOULD INFLATE. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9828664 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page