VALIANT® Captivia VAMC3632C150TURecalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · STENT GRAFT VAMC3632C150TU VALCAP TAPER · Class 3 · Implant
All models of VALIANT Captivia (95)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169346864), received between Mar 21, 2017 and Mar 18, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Leak/Splash” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Leak/Splash4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Death1
- Headache1
- Injury1
- Insufficient Information1
- Nausea1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Tissue Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 18, 2025Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
TWO VALIANT CAPTIVIA STENT GRAFTS WERE IMPLANTED DURING THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A TAA. IT WAS REPORTED APPROXIMATELY 14 MONTHS POST INDEX PROCEDURE THAT THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALISED AND A IA ENDOLEAK WAS OBSERVED. INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED VIA A PROXIMAL TEVAR EXTENSION WHERE A VALIANT CAPTIVIA WAS IMPLANTED ON THE SAME DATE. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE LSA WAS REVASCULARIZED. THE REINTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED HOME IN A STABLE CONDITION. THE SITE ASSESSED THE ENDOLEAK AS HAVING A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP TO THE STUDY DEVICE AND PROBABLY RELATED TO THE STUDY PROCEDURE. NO CLINICAL SEQUALAE WERE PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT IS FINE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21629575 ↗InjuryNov 20, 2020Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
A VALIANT CAPTIVIA STENT GRAFT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A 60 MM THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 44 MONTHS POST INDEX PROCEDURE, PATIENT WAS CONTINUING TO HAVE SYMPTOMS OF THORACIC ANEURYSM. CT WAS PERFORMED, WHERE AN UNKNOWN ENDOLEAK WAS NOTED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO EXPLANT THE STENT GRAFT AND REPAIR ENDOLEAK VIA OPEN SURGICAL MEANS. AS PER THE PHYSICIAN, CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS ANATOMY. IT WAS STATED THAT THE STENT GRAFT WAS PLACED IN HIGHLY ANGULATED PROXIMAL ANATOMY. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUELAE WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT IS FINE
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 10874745 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A VALIANT MONA LSA STENT GRAFT SYSTEM AND A VALIANT CAPTIVIA STENT GRAFT WERE IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT FOR THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE DAYS LATER THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF AN ANTERIOR HEADACHE AND MEDICATIONS WERE GIVEN. THE PATIENT¿S SYMPTOMS IMPROVED AFTER THE LUMBAR DRAIN WAS REMOVED BUT FOUR DAYS POST THE INDEX PROCEDURE EXPERIENCED SUDDEN HEADACHE WITH NAUSEA AND VOMITING. THE EVENT RESOLVED WITH MEDICATION. THE INVESTIGATOR HAS ASSESSED THE EVENT TO NOT BE RELATED TO DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SPONSOR HAS ASSESSED THE EVENT TO NOT BE RELATED TO THE DEVICE BUT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUELAE WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT IS FINE.
Patient problems: Headache; Nausea; Vomiting
MAUDE report 8863823 ↗InjuryJun 1, 2018Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
A VALIANT STENT GRAFT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT FOR THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A RUPTURED 80MM DIAMETER THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON CT FOUR DAYS LATER A TYPE III SEPARATION ENDOLEAK WAS OBSERVED BETWEEN THE PROXIMAL AND DISTAL STENT GRAFT. ANOTHER VALIANT STENT GRAFT WAS PLACED OVER THE JUNCTION TO RESOLVE THE ENDOLEAK ONE WEEK LATER. AS PER THE PHYSICIAN, THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS ANATOMY RELATED DUE TO THE DISTAL STENT GRAFT LANDING ON EXTREMELY TORTUOUS ANATOMY. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUELAE WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT IS FINE.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 7560315 ↗DeathJan 16, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A VALIANT CAPTIVA STENT GRAFT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT FOR THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A 260MM LENGTH THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION. APPROXIMATELY 2 DAYS PRIOR TO THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD AN OPEN DEBRANCHING OF THE AORTIC ARCH AND DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE THE STENT GRAFT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED IN THE THORACIC AORTA, FROM THE INNOMINATE ARTERY ORIGIN TO THE DISTAL THORACIC TO TREAT A DISSECTION WITH IMH. BOTH PROCEDURES WENT WELL. THE FOLLOWING DAY, THE PATIENT HAD SUDDEN ONSET CHEST PAIN AND WAS RUSHED TO CT. THE CT SHOWED A RETROGRADE DISSECTION. PER THE PHYSICIAN, THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT IS UNKNOWN. THE PATIENT DIED SHORTLY AFTER.
Patient problems: Death; Pain; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 7192849 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2017Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
A VALIANT CAPTIVIA STENT GRAFT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT FOR THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A 300 MM THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD PRESENTED 3 TIMES TO THE ER WITH BACK AND ARM PAIN. A CT REVEALED THAT THE FALSE LUMEN WAS FILLING. BECAUSE THIS WAS THE THIRD TIME THE PATIENT PRESENTED, THEIR PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO EXTEND THE VALIANT DEVICE. A 36X32X150 DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED DOWN TO THE CELIAC ARTERY. DURING THE PROCEDURE, NO ANGIOGRAMS WERE PERFORMED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE FALSE LUMEN WAS STILL VISUALIZED USING INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO COMPLICATIONS AND THE EVENT RESOLVED. THE PATIENT COULD MOVE THEIR LEGS AND WAS REPORTEDLY RECOVERING WELL. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUELAE WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT IS FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6422311 ↗
Other SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page