VALIANT® Captivia VAMF2626C150TURecalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · STENT GRAFT VAMF2626C150TU VALCAP FREFL · Class 3 · Implant
All models of VALIANT Captivia (95)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 2
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169347014), received between Apr 12, 2017 and May 23, 2022 — classified as 2 deaths, 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Leak/Splash1
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information2
- Aneurysm1
- Death1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Occlusion1
- Stroke/CVA1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
DeathMay 23, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A VALIANT NAVION AND VALIANT CAPTIVIA STENT GRAFT WERE IMPLANTED FOR THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT EXPIRED 37 DAYS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE MAY HAVE BEEN AORTIC ENLARGEMENT NOTED WITH THE STENT IN PLACE. NO CAUSE OF DEATH HAS BEEN PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUALAE WAS PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT HAS EXPIRED.
Patient problems: Aneurysm; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14469298 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2021Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
A VALIANT CAPTIVIA STENT GRAFT WAS IMPLANTED IN AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS HAVING UNKNOWN SYMPTOMS. AN ANGIOGRAM WAS PERFORMED WHICH SHOWED NO EVIDENCE OF A LEAK AS PER THE PHYSICIAN, ALTHOUGH IT WAS STATED BY A RADIOLOGIST THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF A TYPE III ENDOLEAK PROXIMALLY. INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT, AND AN ADDITIONAL VALIANT STENT GRAFT WAS IMPLANTED. ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NO LEAK FOUND, BUT THE PROXIMAL SEAL ZONE WAS VERY SHORT SO IT WAS DECIDED TO PLACE A GRAFT WITHIN THE EXISTING GRAFT EXTENDING THE EXISTING GRAFT BY APPROXIMATELY 20MM. AS PER THE PHYSICIAN THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT CAN NOT BE DETERMINED. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUELAE WERE PROVIDED AND THE PATIENT IS FINE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11548233 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
A VALIANT STENT GRAFT SYSTEM WAS PLANNED TO BE IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT FOR THE ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A 220MM LENGTH THORACIC DISSECTION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, AS THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGING IT WAS NOTED THAT THE REAR BLUE WHEEL OF THE DEVICE HAD DETACHED AND WAS SNAPPED IN TWO PIECES. NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE OUTER PACKAGING OF THE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED USING ANOTHER VALIANT CAPTIVIA STENT GRAFT SYSTEM. PER THE PHYSICIAN, THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT IS PRODUCT RELATED. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUELAE WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT IS FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7826020 ↗DeathApr 12, 2017Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
A VALIANT STENT GRAFT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT FOR THE EMERGENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A RUPTURED THORACIC ULCER BLEEDING INTO THE AIRWAY . DURING THE INITIAL EMERGENT IMPLANTATION, THE VALIANT STENT GRAFT WAS UNBEKNOWNST AND INADVERTENTLY IMPLANTED COVERING BOTH SUBCLAVIAN ARTERIES. THERE WAS AN UNKNOWN ABERRANT RIGHT SUBCLAVIAN DISTAL TO THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY. AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT THE PATIENT WAS UNSTABLE AND COULD NOT TOLERATE A CAROTID TO SUBCLAVIAN BYPASS, BUT WOULD BE SCHEDULED FOR A LATER DATE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE UNBEKNOWNST COVERING OF BOTH SUBCLAVIAN ARTERIES RESULTED IN A CVA/STROKE AND THE PATIENT EXPIRED EIGHT DAYS LATER. PER THE PHYSICIAN, THE CAUSES OF THE EVENTS WERE RELATED TO THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY. NO ADDITIONAL CLINICAL SEQUELAE WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Death; Occlusion; Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 6488076 ↗
Other SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page