Skip to content

NC Euphora™ NCEUP5012XRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · BALLOON NCEUP5012X NCEUPHORA RX US · Class 2

All models of NC Euphora (40)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169396104), received between Mar 21, 2024 and Sep 12, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Entrapment of Device1

Patient problems

  • Cardiac Arrest1
  • Ischemia1
  • Myocardial Infarction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 12, 2025Entrapment of Device; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Device Damaged by Another Device; Entrapment of Device; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Device Damaged by Another Device

    DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH NON-ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION MANIFESTED BY A SEVERE 90% STENOSIS INVOLVING THE DISTAL LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY EXTENDING INTO THE PROXIMAL SEGMENTS OF THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD) AND LEFT CIRCUMFLEX CORONARY ARTERIES. THREE STENTS WERE IMPLANTED: A 3.0 X 15MM ONYX FRONTIER STENT, A 4.0 X 18 MM ONYX FRONTIER STENT, AND A 4.5 X 18MM ONYX FRONTIER STENT IMPLANTED. A 0.014 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE WAS ADVANCED AND PLACED WITHIN THE DISTAL SEGMENT OF THE LAD. A 0.014 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE WAS PLACED WITHIN THE LEFT CIRCUMFLEX CORONARY ARTERY. A 0.014 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE WAS PLACED WITHIN THE 1ST OBTUSE MARGINAL BRANCH. NEXT, A 2.5 X 12 MM BALLOON WAS USED FROM PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY OF THE DISTAL LEFT MAIN CORONARY EXTENDING INTO THE PROXIMAL LAD. AN IVUS CATHETER WAS THEN ADVANCED AND IVUS ASSESSMENT OF THE LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY AND LAD WAS OBTAINED. NEXT, A 2.5 X 12 MM BALLOON WAS USED FROM FURTHER ANGIOPLASTY OF THE DISTAL LEFT MAIN CORONARY INTO THE PROXIMAL LEFT CIRCUMFLEX CORONARY ARTERY. AN ONYX FRONTIER 3 X 15 MM DRUG-ELUTING STENT WAS THEN ADVANCED AND PLACED WITHIN THE PROXIMAL LEFT CIRCUMFLEX CORONARY EXT

    Patient problems: Ischemia

    MAUDE report 23036039 ↗
  • DeathMar 21, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE TWO ONYX FRONTIER CORONARY DRUG ELUTING STENTS WERE IMPLANTED IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD). ONE LAUNCHER GUIDE CATHETER, ONE EUPHORA BALLOON CATHETER, FIVE NC EUPHORA BALLOON CATHETERS, AND ONE TELESCOPE GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER (GEC) WERE ALSO USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE. ON THE SAME DAY POST PROCEDURE THE PATIENT SUFFERED FROM A SPONTANEOUS MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (MI) AND CARDIAC ARREST / SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH. THE PATIENT WAS DOING WELL AFTER THE PROCEDURE, HAD EATEN DINNER AND EVERYTHING WAS NORMAL WHEN SUDDENLY THE PATIENT COLLAPSED ON THE GROUND. THE PATIENT DID NOT HAVE ANY SYMPTOMS OF CHEST PAIN, DIAPHORESIS, NAUSEA, OR VOMITING. ADVANCED LIFE SAVING MEASURES WERE UTILIZED. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) WAS CONTACTED AND A FAMILY MEMBER TRIED TO DO SOME MOUTH-TO-MOUTH UNTIL THE AMBULANCE ARRIVED. WHEN THE AMBULANCE ARRIVED, THEY DETECTED ELECTROMECHANICAL DISSOCIATION (EMD) AND STARTED CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION (CPR) FOR 30 MINUTES BEF ORE THE PATIENT ARRIVED TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM (ER). ADDITIONAL CPR WAS PERFORMED, HOWEVER, THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING BLOOD PRESSURE. T

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Myocardial Infarction

    MAUDE report 18947614 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page