Skip to content

NC Euphora™ NCEUP37515XRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · BALLOON NCEUP37515X NCEUPHORA RX US · Class 2

All models of NC Euphora (40)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169396272), received between Aug 10, 2017 and Feb 25, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deflation Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Deflation Problem3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2026Deflation Problem; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING ONE NC EUPHORA RX CORONARY BALLOON CATHETER, DEFLATION DIFFICULTIES WERE ENCOUNTERED. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO 8-10ATM IN THE MID LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY AND COULD NOT BE DEFLATED. THE BALLOON WAS DISCONNECTED FROM THE SYRINGE AND THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT THROUGH THE GUIDE CATHETER. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24442616 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 9, 2026Deflation Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A COMPLEX PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) PROCEDURE WITH LITHOTRIPSY, ONE NC EUPHORA CORONARY BALLOON FAILED TO DEFLATE AS EXPECTED. THE PATIENT REQUIRED HOSPITALIZATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24291096 ↗
  • InjuryMar 31, 2022Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove

    AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE AN NC EUPHORA BALLOON CATHETER IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS, MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE PROXIMAL LEFT MAIN (LM) CORONARY ARTERY AND THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. THE DEVICE PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE NOT USED DURING DELIVERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON DEFLATION DIFFICULTIES OCCURRED AFTER POST DILATION OF A STENT. THE DEFLATION DIFFICULTIES OCCURRED FOLLOWING THE FIRST INFLATION. SEVERAL TECHNIQUES WERE MADE TO DEFLATE THE BALLOON INCLUDING CHANGING THE INFLATION DEVICE AND ATTEMPTS TO BURST THE BALLOON WITH NO SUCCESS. WITH SLIGHT PRESSURE COMING OFF THE BALLOON, IT WAS POSSIBLE TO PULL THE BALLOON OUT OF THE STENT, WHILE PARTIALLY INFLATED, BACK THROUGH THE LAD, THROUGH THE LM AND INTO THE GUIDE CATHETER. THE WHOLE SYSTEM WAS REMOVED TOGETHER VIA THE RADIAL ARTERY. POST ANGIOGRAM SHOWED A DISSECTION IN THE LEFT MAIN. AN ADDITIONAL SENT WAS USED TO TREAT THE DISSECTION. NO FURTHER INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 13962612 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2017Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE AN NC EUPHORA BALLOON CATHETER TO TREAT A MILDLY TORTUOUS, SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 95% STENOSIS IN THE PROXIMAL LAD. THE PATIENT HAS A KNOWN HISTORY OF CAD. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES. NEGATIVE PREP WAS PERFORMED WITH NO ISSUES.THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. DURING ADVANCEMENT THROUGH THE GUIDE CATHETER THE DEVICE FRACTURED. BALLOON HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN USED TO POST DILATE. STENT NEEDED FURTHER POST DILATION, SO BALLOON WAS LOADED ON GUIDEWIRE, ADVANCEMENT WAS ATTEMPTED BUT IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN COULDN¿T SEE DISTAL BALLOON ADVANCING UNDER FLUORO DESPITE PROXIMAL SHAFT BEING ADVANCED. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN LOOKED IN THE GUIDE CATHETER, IT WAS SEEN THAT THERE WAS NO ADVANCEMENT OF THE DISTAL DESPITE ADVANCING PROXIMAL SHAFT. PULLED NEGATIVE AND NOTED BLOOD RUSHING BACK INTO INFLATION DEVICE. ATTEMPTED WITHDRAWAL AND PROXIMAL SHAFT CAME OUT OF GUIDE AND DISTAL PORTION REMAINED IN GUIDE CATHETER. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE FRACTURED WITHIN GUIDE CATHETER. THE DETACHMENT OCCURRED NEAR THE MIDDLE OF THE SHAFT. A 2.5X15 SC EUPH

    Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 6783863 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page