Skip to content

CD HORIZON® Spinal System 25740018580Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW 25740018580 BS CNMAS 8.5X80 TC S · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CD HORIZON Spinal System (342)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169414914), received between May 14, 2019 and Jul 1, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Migration2
  • No Apparent Adverse Event2
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Mechanical Jam1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Pain2

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 1, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION T9¿SAI FIXATION DUE TO ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LEFT SAISCREW BACKED OUT, THE ROD BECAME DETACHED, AND THE SET SCREW DISLODGED. A ROD FRACTURE WAS ALSO OBSERVED AT LEFT L3/4. THE SCREW HAD GRADUALLY BACKED OUT STARTING AROUND THE YEAR FOLLOWING THE INITIAL SURGERY. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON JUNE 8 TO EXPLANT THE PRODUCTS. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25675391 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING A REVISION SURG ERY FOR PAIN DURING MOVEMENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LEFT PLUG (S2) DISLODGED AND THE RIGHT PLUG (S2) WAS LOOSE. SCREWS WERE LOOSE ON BOTH SIDES, LEFT F9.5-80MM, RIGHT F9.5-90MM AND WERE RE-INSTALLED. THE S1 PLUGS LOOSENED AND WAS REMOVED TOTALLY. THE PATIENT HAD PAIN DURING MOVEMENT, WAS RE-HOSPITALIZATED AND HAD A REPEAT SURGERY. THERE WAS NO OTHER PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO F URTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18648517 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE FACILITY (HCP) VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING SPINAL PRODUCT WHICH IS USED IN POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION FOR SCOLIOSIS CORRECTION SPINAL THERAPY FOR SCOLIOSIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SET SCREW APPEARS TO HAVE COME AWAY FROM THE BALLAST SCREWHEAD. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS OR SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT IN THE FIRST FOLLOW UP, THE RIGHT SIDE ROD AND BALLAST SCREW HEAD NOT CONNECTED AND DURING 2ND FOLLOW UP APPOINTMENT, SET SCREW HAS COME AWAY FROM BALLAST SCREW HEAD. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE IS NO MALFUNCTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE ROD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16535272 ↗
  • InjuryDec 22, 2021Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDE WIRE GOT STUCK IN THE HOLLOW PART OF THE SCREW AND WHEN REMOVING IT, THE SCREW WAS REMOVED TOGETHER. IN THE S2 SACRAL FORAMEN PART, SCREW INSERTION MARK WAS FORMED. IN AN ADDITIONAL SURGERY THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS CHANGED FROM S2AI TO ILIAC SCREW DURING THE SAME DAY . THERE WAS NO FRAGMENT LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT. PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FOR THIS PROCEDURE IS ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13057980 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2020No Apparent Adverse Event; Migration; No Apparent Adverse Event; Migration

    INTRA-OP, THE SET SCREW HAD COME OFF FROM THE BALLAST SCREW PLACED ON THE CAUDAL SIDE. HENCE THE BALLAST SCREW IS EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9756057 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2020No Apparent Adverse Event; Migration; No Apparent Adverse Event; Migration

    AS PER THE UPDATE RECEIVED, THERE IS NO ISSUE WITH THE REPORTED SCREW.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9756042 ↗
  • InjuryMay 14, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ANTERIOR VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT SURGERY AND POSTERIOR FIXATION AT T4-S2AI DUE TO VERTEBRAL BODY COLLAPSE AT L4. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, POST OP, SET SCREW ON THE CAUDAL SIDE TOTALLY BACKED OUT FROM THE SCREW HEAD AT S1/S2AI. SINCE ON ONE SIDE, THE DIRECTION OF THE SCREW HEAD AT S1 AND THE SCREW HEAD AT S2AI WERE DIFFERENT, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO HAVE BACK OUT ISSUE, BUT ALL THE FOUR SET SCREWS STILL BACKED OUT. THE PATIENT ALSO HAD PAIN IN THE LOWER BACK DUE TO SET SCREW BACKING OUT. HENCE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY, IN WHICH SCREW REPLACEMENT AND FUSION FOR EXTENDING THE ROD WAS PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8606820 ↗
  • InjuryMay 14, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ANTERIOR VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT SURGERY AND POSTERIOR FIXATION AT T4-S2AI DUE TO VERTEBRAL BODY COLLAPSE AT L4. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, POST OP, SET SCREW ON THE CAUDAL SIDE TOTALLY BACKED OUT FROM THE SCREW HEAD AT S1/S2AI. SINCE ON ONE SIDE, THE DIRECTION OF THE SCREW HEAD AT S1 AND THE SCREW HEAD AT S2AI WERE DIFFERENT, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO HAVE BACK OUT ISSUE, BUT ALL THE FOUR SET SCREWS STILL BACKED OUT. THE PATIENT ALSO HAD PAIN IN THE LOWER BACK DUE TO SET SCREW BACKING OUT. HENCE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY, IN WHICH SCREW REPLACEMENT AND FUSION FOR EXTENDING THE ROD WAS PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8606760 ↗

Other Pedicle screw spinal system, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis devices

All Pedicle screw spinal system, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page