Arctic Front Advance™ 2AF284 (UDI 00643169504783)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · CATHETER 2AF284 ARCTIC FRONT ADV US 28MM · Class 3
All models of Arctic Front Advance (11)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169504783), received between Jan 18, 2017 and Feb 24, 2017 — classified as 6 injuries.
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P100010); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
Patient problems
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
- Nerve Damage1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Pericardial Effusion1
- Stenosis1
- Tachycardia1
- Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 24, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER A CRYO ABLATION PROCEDURE, WHEN THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS MANIPULATED IN THE LEFT ATRIUM, THE PATIENT'S TRANSIENT BLOOD-PRESSURE DROPPED AND THE HEART RATE INCREASED. NORADRENALIN, SALT SOLUTION AND VASOLAN WERE ADMINISTERED AND BLOOD PRESSURE WAS REGAINED. THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL NOTED THIS MAY HAVE BEEN DUE TO DEHYDRATION. ADDITIONALLY, BLEEDING OCCURRED FROM THE INGUINAL REGION WHERE THE SHEATH WAS INSERTED. WHEN THE PATIENT LEFT AN OPERATION ROOM, STABLE CARDIOHEMODYNAMICS WERE OBSERVED. NO PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WAS CONFIRMED AND THE PATIENT RESPONDED NORMALLY WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TALKED TO PATIENT. THE PATIENT'S FOUR LIMBS MOTION WAS NORMAL. A PHYSICIAN TAKING CARE OF THE PATIENT COMMENTED THAT A VESSEL NEAR THE VEIN WAS POSSIBLY DAMAGED FROM THE SIDE WHERE THE SHEATH WAS INSERTED. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH CRYO. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension; Tachycardia
MAUDE report 6356778 ↗InjuryFeb 20, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CRYO ABLATION PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED INTO THE PERICARDIUM. IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS A SMALL PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WHICH LEAD TO AN EXTENDED HOSPITAL STAY. THE CASE WAS ABORTED WHILE THE PATIENT WAS UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED TO DRAIN THE FLUID FROM THE PATIENT¿S PERICARDIUM. THE PATIENT RECOVERED AND NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Pericardial Effusion
MAUDE report 6344256 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TO A CRYO ABLATION PROCEDURE, A KINK WAS OBSERVED IN THE TUBING UNDER THE BALLOON FOLLOWED BY A SYSTEM NOTICE WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT THE SAFETY SYSTEM DETECTED A COMPROMISED OUTER VACUUM. THE CASE WAS ABORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6283009 ↗InjuryJan 26, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CRYOABLATION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A THROMBUS THAT WAS OBSERVED ON THE LEFT CARINA VIA INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (ICE). THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH CRYO. THE PATIENT'S STAY WAS EXTENDED A DAY AT THE HOSPITAL AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED WITH AN EXTRA DOSE OF MEDICATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Thrombus
MAUDE report 6279456 ↗InjuryJan 18, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE MONTHS POST CRYO ABLATION PROCEDURE, A POST-OPERATIVE COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) SCAN REVEALED "SEVERE" PULMONARY VEIN (PV) STENOSIS IN THE LEFT INFERIOR PULMONARY VEIN. A BALLOON DILATION WAS PERFORMED TO CORRECT THE STENOSIS. THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH CRYO AND NO SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED BY THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Stenosis
MAUDE report 6261477 ↗InjuryJan 18, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CRYO ABLATION PROCEDURE MOVEMENT OF THE DIAPHRAGM WAS WEAKENED DURING ABLATION OF THE RIGHT INFERIOR PULMONARY VEIN (RIPV). THE CONDITION IMPROVED AND ABLATION OF THE RIGHT SUPERIOR PULMONARY VEIN (RSPV) WAS PERFORMED AND PHRENIC NERVE PALSY (PNP) OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH CRYO BUT THE DIAPHRAGM WAS ONLY WORKING SLIGHTLY WHEN THE PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Nerve Damage
MAUDE report 6260557 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P100010. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0149-2012 · Aug 29, 2011 · TerminatedMedtronic Arctic Front Catheter, Sterile EO, Medtronic CryoCath LP, Kirkland, Quebec, H9H 5 H3, Canada, Model 2AF282 and 2AF231 ( not distributed in US) Product Usage: The Medtr
Other Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation devices
- TactiCath™ A-TCSE-DFSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall23 deaths923 reports
- TactiCath™ PN-004075St. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation7 deaths338 reports
- TactiFlex™ Sensor Enabled™ A-TFSE-DFSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall6 deaths241 reports
- TactiCath™ A-TCSE-FJSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall3 deaths174 reports
- Sphere-9™ Catheter AFR-00001Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall3 deaths147 reports
- TactiCath™ A-TCSE-DSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation2 deaths175 reports
- TactiSys™ PN-004400St. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall125 reports
- QDOT MICRO D139402Biosense Webster Inc · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation3 deaths171 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page