Visualase 9735552Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · LASER 9735552 15W 980NM - VISUALASE · Class 2
All models of Visualase (25)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169590076), received between May 15, 2018 and Jul 30, 2018 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K081656); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Hematuria2
- Fever1
- Hematoma1
- Inflammation1
- Intracranial Hemorrhage1
- Memory Loss/Impairment1
- Nerve Damage1
- Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 30, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE ATTACHED JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS FORWARDED BY MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE. ARTICLE INDICATED THE USE OF THERMAL THERAPY SYSTEM. FOCAL LASER ABLATION IS A POTENTIAL TREATMENT IN SOME MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER. CURRENTLY FOCAL LASER ABLATION IS PERFORMED BY RADIOLOGISTS IN A MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING UNIT (IN BORE). WE EVALUATED THE SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY OF PERFORMING FOCAL LASER ABLATION IN A UROLOGY CLINIC (OUT OF BORE) USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION FOR GUIDANCE. A TOTAL OF 11 MEN WITH INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER WERE ENROLLED IN THIS PROSPECTIVE, INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPROVED PILOT STUDY. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION WAS USED TO GUIDE LASER FIBERS TRANSRECTALLY INTO REGIONS OF INTEREST HARBORING INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER. THERMAL PROBES WERE INSERTED FOR REAL-TIME MONITORING OF INTRAPROSTATIC TEMPERATURES DURING LASER ACTIVATION. MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (3 TESLA) WAS DONE IMMEDIATELY AFTER TREATMENT AND AT 6 MONTHS ALONG WITH COMPREHENSIVE FUSION BIOPSY. TEN OF 11 PATIENTS WERE SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WHILE UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA. MEAN PROCEDURE TIME WAS 95 MINUTES (RANGE 71 TO 105). POSTTREATMENT MAGNETIC RESO
Patient problems: Hematuria
MAUDE report 7733518 ↗InjuryMay 16, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS FORWARDED BY MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE. ARTICLE INDICATED THE USE OF THERMAL THERAPY SYSTEM. SEVENTY-ONE (71) PATIENTS WITH THE DIAGNOSIS OF GELASTIC EPILEPSY RELATED TO HH WERE TREATED AT A SINGLE CENTER WITH STEREOTACTIC LASER ABLATION FROM MARCH 11, 2011 TO FEBRUARY 9,2018. THERE WERE 46 MALES IN THE COHORT, AGES FROM 5 MONTHS TO 20 YEARS. SEVENTY-ONE (71) PATIENTS WITH THE DIAGNOSIS OF GELASTIC EPILEPSY RELATED TO HH WERE TREATED AT A SINGLE CENTER WITH STEREOTACTIC LASER ABLATION FROM MARCH 11, 2011 TO FEBRUARY 9,2018. THERE WERE 46 MALES IN THE COHORT, AGES FROM 5 MONTHS TO 20 YEARS. SIXTEEN PATIENTS, 25%, HAD FAILED OTHER SURGICAL OR RADIOSURGICAL INTERVENTIONS. AFTER STEREOTACTIC LASER ABLATION, 93% OF THE PATIENTS WERE FREE OF THEIR GELASTIC SEIZURES AT ONE YEAR, AND 78% OF THE PATIENTS WITH LESS THAN A YEAR OF FOLLOW-UP ARE FREE OF GELASTIC SEIZURES. TWENTY ONE OF THE PATIENTS IN THIS SERIES HAD SECONDARY SEIZURES THAT WERE LESSENED BY ABLATION AND CONTROLLED WITH MEDICINES. FOURTEEN OF THE PATIENTS, 20%, REQUIRED TWO ABLATIONS, AND 2 PATIENTS REQUIRED THREE ABLATIONS. MOST PATIENTS EXPERIENCE A NEAR INSTANT IMPROVEMENT IN THEIR CONDITION. 12% WERE
Patient problems: Memory Loss/Impairment; No Code Available; Polydipsia; Seizures
MAUDE report 7520685 ↗InjuryMay 16, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE ATTACHED JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS FORWARDED BY MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE. ARTICLE INDICATED THE USE OF THERMAL THERAPY SYSTEM. FIFTEEN PATIENTS WERE INCLUDED FOR THIS STUDY. MEDIAN AGE WERE 66 YEARS. ALL PATIENTS TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO GRADE 3 COMPLICATIONS. 4 PATIENTS HAD GRADE 2 COMPLICATIONS (N=2 URINARY TRACT INFECTION, N=1 WORSENING LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, N=1 BILATERAL EPIDIDYMITIS. 8 PATIENTS HAD GRADE 1 COMPLICATIONS (N=5 GROSS HEMATURIA, N=3 MINOR GRADE 1 COMPLAINTS E.G. URGENCY, SMALL PRESSURE ULCER, POSTOPERATIVE FEVER). ALL EVENTS RESOLVED COMPLETELY. FOLLOW UP TARGETED BIOPSY REVEALED NO EVIDENCE OF CANCER IN N=10 PATIENTS, WHEREAS IN 5 PATIENTS FOLLOW UP BIOPSY WAS POSITIVE (N=3 HAD 2ND FLA SESSION, N=2 UNDERWENT PROSTATECTOMY). MPMRI GUIDED FLA IS SAFE AND FEASIBLE WITHOUT ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN URINARY AND SEXUAL FUNCTION WITH REASONABLE ONCOLOGIC RESULTS.
Patient problems: Fever; Hematuria; Inflammation; Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 7520584 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE ATTACHED JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS FORWARDED BY MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE. ARTICLE INDICATED THE USE OF LASER ABLATION SYSTEM. SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 58 PATIENTS WITH MESIAL TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY (MTLE) WHO UNDERWENT THE SURGERY AT OUR INSTITUTION WITH AT LEAST 12 MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP WERE RETROSPECTIVELY EVALUATED, INCLUDING 33 FEMALES AND 25 MALES, RANGING IN AGE FROM 16 TO 67 YEARS (MEAN OF 40 YEARS) AT THE TIME OF FIRST SLAH. ALL PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT STEREOTACTIC LASER AMYGDALOHIPPOCAMPOTOMY (SLAH) FOR MTLE BETWEEN JULY 1, 2011 AND JUNE 30, 2016. PATIENTS WHO WERE NOT FREE OF DISABLING SEIZURES FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE WERE CONSIDERED FOR FURTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION, INCLUDING OPEN RESECTION AND, FOR PATIENTS IN WHOM REVIEW OF AN INTERVAL POSTOPERATIVE MRI SCAN SHOWED A REMNANT REGION OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS AND/OR UNCUS THOUGHT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING SEIZURES, REPEAT ABLATIONS. THE LATTER WERE PERFORMED IN A FASHION SIMILAR TO THE INITIAL ABLATION BUT FROM A MORE LATERAL ENTRY, TARGETING THE REMNANT MEDIAL TEMPORAL STRUCTURES. PATIENTS WHO FAILED A REPEAT ABLATION WERE AGAIN CONSIDERED FOR OPEN SURGICAL PROCEDURES. A TOTAL OF 67 LASER ABLATION PROCEDURE
Patient problems: Hematoma; Intracranial Hemorrhage; Nerve Damage; Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 7517355 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K081656. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-3251-2018 · Jun 1, 2018 · TerminatedVisualase Thermal Therapy System, Software: Visualase Software versions 3.1.1 - 3.2, Product #: 9735542
Other Powered laser surgical instrument devices
- Moxy 0010-2400Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument4,572 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-PLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls450 reports
- Flexiva TracTip M0068403960Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument562 reports
- Moses™ AC-10030100Lumenis Ltd. · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument532 reports
- Flexiva M0068403910Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument376 reports
- Visualase 9735542Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Powered laser surgical instrument1 recall2 deaths311 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-SLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls33 reports
- NeuroBlate® System 20980Monteris Medical Inc · Powered laser surgical instrument7 deaths296 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page